Adapting to Another “New Normal”: The Pandemic’s Impact on Generation Z’s Team Dynamics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v24i2.7158Keywords:
management, teamwork, post-pandemic, conflict management, Generation ZAbstract
The role of teamwork in modern organizations is more crucial than ever. This research investigates whether the COVID-19 pandemic has permanently altered Generation Z’s perceptions and behavior on team projects. A study of graduating seniors at a Southeastern university found decreased team conflicts during and after the pandemic compared to pre-pandemic levels. Task attractiveness and interpersonal cohesiveness declined during COVID-19 but rebounded post-pandemic, though not to pre-pandemic levels. These findings have implications for educational programs, workforce development, and organizational practices aimed at supporting Generation Z’s success and well-being as they transition into their careers.
References
Aguado, D., Rico, R., Sanchez-Manzanares, M., & Salas, E. (2014). Teamwork competency test (TWCT): A step forward on measuring teamwork competencies. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice, 18(2), 101. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/a0036098.
Alwin, D.F., & McCammon, R.J. (2007). Rethinking generations. Research in Human Development, 4(3–4), 219–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/15427600701663072
Amabile, T.M., & Pratt, M.G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001
Awuor, N.O., Weng, C., & Militar, R. (2022). Teamwork competency and satisfaction in online group project-based engineering course: The cross-level moderating effect of collective efficacy and flipped instruction. Computers & Education, 176, 104357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104357
Beal, D.J., Cohen, R.R., Burke, M.J., & McLendon, C.L. (2003). Cohesion and performance in groups: A meta-analytic clarification of construct relations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(6), 989–1004. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.6.989
Behfar, K.J., Peterson, R.S., Mannix, E.A., & Trochim, W.M. (2008). The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: A close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(1), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.170
Bonebright, D.A. (2010). 40 years of storming: A historical review of Tuckman’s model of small group development. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/13678861003589099
Borrego, M., Karlin, J., McNair, L.D., & Beddoes, K. (2013). Team effectiveness theory from industrial and organizational psychology applied to engineering student project teams: A research review. Journal of Engineering Education, 102(4), 472–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20023
Carless, S.A., & De Paola, C. (2000). The measurement of cohesion in work teams. Small Group Research, 31(1), 71–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/104649640003100104
Connolly, J. (2019). Generational conflict and the sociology of generations: Mannheim and Elias reconsidered. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(7–8), 153–172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276419827085
Davey, L. (2019). The Good Fight: Use Productive Conflict to Get Your Team and Organization Back on Track. Harper Collins.
Eden, J., Mirabito, T., Rogers, R., & Hoffmann, N. (2022). Impacting student satisfaction, engagement and motivation in online and traditional classrooms. KOME: An International Journal of Pure Communication Inquiry, 10(2), 60–75. http://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.75672.91
Franz, B., Leicht, R., Molenaar, K., & Messner, J. (2017). Impact of team integration and group cohesion on project delivery performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 143(1), 04016088. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)co.1943-7862.0001219
Gagné, M., Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2018). Self-determination theory applied to work motivation and organizational behavior. In D.S. Ones, N. Anderson, C. Viswesvaran, & H.K. Sinangil (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Industrial, Work & Organizational Psychology: Organizational Psychology (2nd Ed., pp. 97–121). Sage Reference.
Gilson, L.L., Maynard, M.T., Jones Young, N.C., Vartiainen, M., & Hakonen, M. (2015). Virtual Teams Research: 10 Years, 10 Themes, and 10 Opportunities. Journal of Management, 41(5), 1313–1337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206314559946
Gregersen, E.M., Astrupgaard, S.L., Jespersen, M.H., Gårdhus, T.P., & Albris, K. (2023). Digital dependence: Online fatigue and coping strategies during the COVID-19 lockdown. Media, Culture & Society, 45(5), 967–984. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437231154781
Grossman, R., Nolan, K., Rosch, Z., Mazer, D., & Salas, E. (2022). The team cohesion-performance relationship: A meta-analysis exploring measurement approaches and the changing team landscape. Organizational Psychology Review, 12(2), 181–238. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866211041157
Guppy, N., Verpoorten, D., Boud, D., Lin, L., Tai, J., & Bartolic, S. (2022). The post-COVID-19 future of digital learning in higher education: Views from educators, students, and other professionals in six countries. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(6), 1750–1765. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13212
Harari, T.T.E., Sela, Y., & Bareket-Bojmel, L. (2023). Gen Z during the COVID-19 crisis: A comparative analysis of the differences between Gen Z and Gen X in resilience, values and attitudes. Current Psychology, 42(28), 24223–24232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-022-03501-4
Hayek, A.M. (2021). Generation We: The Power and Promise of Gen Z. Lioncrest Publishing.
Islam, S., Nieman-Gonder, J., & Cassel, D. (2021). Team process measurement: A comparison of criterion-related validity of teamwork appraisal tools. American Journal of Management, 21(1), 32–48. https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v21i1.4108
Jehn, K.A., & Mannix, E.A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238–251. https://doi.org/10.2307/3069453
Juban, R., Wallace, D., & Vicknair, J. (2021). The perfect storm in higher education. American Journal of Management, 21(3), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.33423/ajm.v21i3.4358
Katz, R., Ogilvie, S., Shaw, J., & Woodhead, L. (2022). Gen Z, Explained: The Art of Living in a Digital Age. University of Chicago Press.
Katzenbach, J.R., & Smith, D.K. (2015). The Wisdom of Teams: Creating the High-Performance Organization. Harvard Business Review Press.
Khaldi, A., Bouzidi, R. & Nader, F. (2023). Gamification of e-learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 10(10), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00227-z
Lam, C. (2015). The role of communication and cohesion in reducing social loafing in group projects. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 78(4), 454–475. https://doi.org/10.1177/2329490615596417
Lanier, K. (2017). 5 Things HR professionals need to know about generation Z: Thought leaders share their views on the HR profession and its direction for the future. Strategic HR Review, 16(6), 288–290. https://doi.org/10.1108/SHR-08-2017-0051
Leal Filho, W., Wall, T., Rayman-Bacchus, L., Mifsud, M., Pritchard, D.J., Lovren, V.O., . . . Balogun, A.L. (2021). Impacts of COVID-19 and social isolation on academic staff and students at universities: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1213. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11040-z
Leonard-Barton, D., & Swap, W.C. (2005). Deep Smarts: How to Cultivate and Transfer Enduring Business Wisdom. Harvard Business Press.
Loughry, M.L., Ohland, M.W., & Woehr, D.J. (2014). Assessing teamwork skills for assurance of learning using CATME team tools. Journal of Marketing Education, 36(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475313499023
Lu, W., & Guo, W. (2019). The effect of task conflict on relationship quality: The mediating role of relational behavior. Negotiation and Conflict Management Research, 12(4), 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1111/ncmr.12150
Mathieu, J., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T., & Gilson, L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34(3), 410–476. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308316061
McCrindle, M., & Fell, A. (2019). Understanding Generation Z: Recruiting, Training and Leading the Next Generation. McCrindle Research Pty Ltd.
Morrison, E.S., Naro-Maciel, E., & Bonney, K.M. (2021). Innovation in a time of crisis: Adapting active learning approaches for remote biology courses. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(1), 10–1128. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.v22i1.2341
Moss, J. (2020). If you’re burning out, carve a new path. Harvard Business Review Digital Articles, pp. 1–5. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2020/04/if-youre-burning-out-carve-a-new-path
O’Boyle, C., Atack, J., & Monahan, K. (2017). Generation Z enters the workforce: Generational and technological challenges in entry-level jobs. Deloitte Insights. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/technology-andthe-future-of-work/generation-z-enters-workforce.html
Pueschel, A., Johnson, R.C., & Dhanani, L.Y. (2020). Putting Gen Z first: Educating with a generational mind-set. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 13(4), 594–598. https://doi.org/10.1017/iop.2020.103
Schlee, R.P., Eveland, V.B., & Harich, K.R. (2020). From Millennials to Gen Z: Changes in student attitudes about group projects. Journal of Education for Business, 95(3), 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.2019.1622501
Seats, K.J., Lawrence, J.F., & Prieto, G.A. (2012). Improved ambient noise correlation functions using Welch’s method. Geophysical Journal International, 188(2), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-246X.2011.05263.x
Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2015). Generation Z Goes to College. John Wiley & Sons.
Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: Hybrid and blended learning approach for COVID-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865
Stillman, D., & Stillman, J. (2017). Gen Z @ Work: How the Next Generation Is Transforming the Workplace. New York, NY: Harper Business.
Sumolang, N. (2023). The role of information technology in Z Generation behavior change in dealing with conflict. International Journal of Information Technology and Education, 2(3), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.62711/ijite.v2i3.125
Tjosvold, D. (2008). The conflict‐positive organization: It depends upon us. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(1), 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.473
Twenge, J.M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids Are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy – And Completely Unprepared for Adulthood. Atria Books.
Vallerand, R.J., Houlfort, N., & Bourdeau, S. (2019). Passion for work: The dualistic model of passion—15 years later. In R.J. Vallerand, & N. Houlfort (Eds.), Passion for Work: Theory, Research, and Applications (pp. 17–66). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190648626.003.0002
VisionCritical. (2016). The Everything Guide to Generation Z. Retrieved from https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/4976390/E-books/English%20e-books/The%20everything%20guide%20to%20gen%20z/the-everything-guide-to-gen-z.pdf
Volini, E., Schwartz, J., Roy, I., & Hauptmann, M. (2019). Organizational performance: It’s a team sport. Deloitte Insights, 11. Retrieved from https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/focus/human-capital-trends/2019/team-based-organization.html
Wardak, D., Vallis, C., & Bryant, P. (2022). # OurPlace2020: Blurring boundaries of learning spaces. Postdigital Science and Education, 4(1), 116–137. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00264-2
Wei, S., Tan, L., Zhang, Y., & Ohland, M. (2023). The effect of the emergency shift to virtual instruction on student team dynamics. European Journal of Engineering Education, pp. 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2023.2217422
Zaccaro, S.J., & Bader, P. (2003). E-leadership and the challenges of leading e-teams: Minimizing the bad and maximizing the good. Organizational Dynamics, 31(4), 377–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0090-2616(02)00129-8
