The Effect of Occupational Feminization on the Returns to Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v26i3.7097Keywords:
business, economics, occupational segregation, returns to schooling, gender wage differencesAbstract
This study explores whether workers in female-dominated occupations have lower returns to schooling than workers in integrated or male-dominated occupations. Our analysis of 2023 CPS earnings data for year-round full-time workers indicates that the earnings benefits to additional schooling decline as the female density of occupations increases. This finding is consistent with the occupational feminization literature. However, we also find that females have higher returns to schooling than males in integrated and male-dominated occupational categories. Overall, women have achieved the highest labor market success in terms of returns to schooling in male-dominant occupations.
References
Addison, J.T., Ozturk, O.D., & Wang, S. (2018). The occupational feminization of wages. ILR Review, 71(1), 208–241.
Blau, F.D., & Kahn, L.M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Extent, trends, and explanations. Journal of Economic Literature, 55(3), 789–865.
Blau, F.D., Brummund, P., & Liu, A.Y.-H. (2013). Trends in occupational segregation by gender 1970-2009: Adjusting for the impact of changes in the occupational coding system. Demography, 50(2), 471–492.
Cozzi, M. (2017). The gender wage gap: Does it pay to follow the crowd? The Park Place Economist, 25, 1–14.
Dominica, B., Gabriel, P.E., & Schmitz, S. (2022). The impact of occupational feminization on the gender wage gap and estimates of wage discrimination. Applied Economics Letters, 29(17), 1605–1609.
Flood, S., King, M., Rodgers, R., Ruggles, S., & Warren, J.R. (2023). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 8.0 [dataset]. Minneapolis, MN: IPUMS.
Goldin, C., Kerr, S.P., Olivetti, C., & Barth, E. (2017). The expanding gender earnings gap: Evidence from the LEHD-2000 Census. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings, 107(5), 110–114.
Grönlund, A., & Magnusson, C. (2013). Devaluation, crowding or skill specificity? Exploring the mechanism behind the lower wages in female professions. Social Science Research, 42(4), 1006–1017.
Heckman, J. (1974). Shadow prices, market wages, and labor supply. Econometrica, 42(4), 679–694.
Institute of Education Sciences, & National Center for Education Statistics. (2022). Table 104.30: Number and percentage distribution of persons aged 18 and over, by highest level of educational attainment, sex, race/ethnicity, and age.
Kochhar, R. (2023, March 1). The Enduring Grip of the Gender Pay Gap. Pew Research Center.
Laing, D. (2011). Labor Economics: Introduction to Classic and the New Labor Economics. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Mandel, H. (2018). A second look at the process of occupational feminization and pay reduction in occupations. Demography, 55(2), 669–690.
Río, C., & Alonso-Villar, O. (2015). The evolution of occupational segregation in the United States, 1940–2010: Gains and losses of gender–race/ethnicity groups. Demography, 52(3), 967–988.
Strawinski, P., Majchrowska, A., & Broniatowska, P. (2018). Occupational segregation and wage differences: The case of Poland. International Journal of Manpower, 39(3), 378–397.
van Garderen, K.J., & Shah, C. (2002). Exact interpretation of dummy variables in semilogarithmic equations. The Econometrics Journal, 5(1), 149–159.
Weeden, K.A., Cha, Y., & Bucca, M. (2016). Long work hours, part-time work, and trends in the gender gap in pay, the motherhood wage penalty, and the fatherhood wage premium. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(4), 71–102.
