A Practical Approach to Determine NPV, IRR, and MIRR Ranking Conflicts With Excel

Authors

  • Yongbeom Kim Fairleigh Dickinson University
  • Sorin Tuluca Fairleigh Dickinson University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v26i3.7150

Keywords:

business, economics, NPV, IRR, MIRR, WACC, ranking conflict, conflict regions

Abstract

DCF methods, except the case of multiple IRRs, identify good projects when analyzed individually. However, all might conflict when ranking projects. MIRR, a method that addresses the multiple IRR problem, is a complex method for analyzing investments as it includes a reinvestment rate. Most finance textbooks do not discuss, even though some mention, the ranking conflict between NPV and MIRR. Along with the known conflict between NPV and IRR, we present an original method to determine if there is a conflict between NPV and MIRR, and the regions of the discount rate where a conflict is present or not. This method, verified by an Excel analysis, is useful to practitioners and educators alike.

References

Ben-Horin, M., & Kroll, Y. (2017). A simple intuitive NPV-IRR consistent ranking. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 66, 108–114.

Bierman, Jr., H., & Smidt, S. (2007). The Capital Budgeting Decision (9th Ed.). Routledge.

Biondi, Y. (2003). Les Recherches sur les Rentes de Duvillard (1787) et le Taux Interne de Rentabilité. Revue d’histoire des mathématiques, 9, 81–125.

Brealy, R.A., Myers, S.C., & Allen, F. (2014). Principles of Corporate Finance (11th Ed.). Mc Graw Hill.

Brigham, E.F., & Daves, P.R. (2022). Intermediate Financial Management (14th Ed.). Cengage Learning.

Brigham, E.F., & Ehrhardt, M.C. (2017). Financial Management: Theory and Practice (15th Ed.). Cengage Learning.

Cary, D., & Dunn, M. (1997). Adjustment of modified internal rate of return for scale and time span differences. In Proceedings of the Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies (Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 57–63). Jordan Whitney Enterprises, Inc.

Clauss, F.J. (2010). Corporate Financial Analysis with Microsoft Excel. McGraw Hill.

Dudley, C.L. (1972). A note on reinvestment assumptions in choosing between net present value and internal rate of return. Journal of Finance, 27(4), 907–915.

Hatem, J.J., Johnston, K., & Yang, B.Z. (2013). Teaching MIRR to improve comprehension of investment performance evaluation techniques: A comment. Journal of Economics and Finance Education, 2(2), 56–59.

Lin, S.A. (1976). The modified internal rate of return and investment criterion. The Engineering Economist, 21(4), 237–247.

Pinches, G.E. (1994). Financial Management (5th Ed.). Harper Collins College.

Ross, S.A., Westerfield, R.W., & Jaffe, J.F. (2022). Corporate Finance (13th Ed.). McGraw Hill.

Tuluca, S. (2016) Teaching about the Reinvestment Rate Assumption and Conflicts in Capital Budgeting. In Proceedings of the 3rd Teaching & Education Conference (pp. 217–222).

Walker, J.S., Check, Jr., H.F., & Randall, K.L. (2011). Does the internal rate of return calculation require a reinvestment rate assumption? —There is still no consensus. Pennsylvania Economic Review, 18(1), 37–56.

Downloads

Published

2024-08-07

How to Cite

Kim, Y., & Tuluca, S. (2024). A Practical Approach to Determine NPV, IRR, and MIRR Ranking Conflicts With Excel. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 26(3). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v26i3.7150

Issue

Section

Articles