Institutionalist Thought: Ceremonial-Instrumental Dichotomy of the Veblen-Ayres Tradition
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v26i5.7350Keywords:
business, economics, ceremonial-instrumental dichotomy, Old Institutional Theory, Veblen-Ayres’s traditionAbstract
Veblen and Ayres’ ceremonial-instrumental dichotomy is considered the analytical core of Old Institutional Theory (OIT). This view offers a distinct perspective for analyzing economic issues. The object of economics is studied at the level of cultural generalization, not individual generalization (as neoclassicists do). Human behavior is understood as a process of cumulative adaptation to contextual circumstances. Thus, understanding the meaning of the dichotomy – of doing things and making social distinctions, and of its application to illuminate modern economic problems – deserves attention. This systematic literature review describes the main theoretical, analytical, methodological, and empirical contributions to the ceremonial-instrumental dichotomy of the Veblen-Ayres tradition. To this end, articles on the topic published in the last 46 years were reviewed, which resulted in the analysis of 45 articles, which can be classified as a) conceptual b) methodological; c) empirical, and d) literature reviews. This body of analysis provided insights that lead to inferring the possibility of research in different fields of social sciences.
References
Adams, J., & Brunner, H.P. (2003). Technology and institutions in the process of economic reform: Achieving growth with poverty reduction in South Asia. Journal of Economic Issues, 37(2), 363–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2003.11506583
Almeida, F., & Pessali, H. (2017). Revisiting the evolutionism of Edith Penrose’s The theory of the growth of the firm: Penrose’s entrepreneur meets Veblenian institutions. EconomiA, 18(3), 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econ.2017.03.002
Ayres, C.E. (1944). The theory of economic progress. The University of North Carolina Press.
Ayres, C.E. (1996 [1944]). The theory of economic progress. Retrieved from https://afee.net/downloads/AFEEbooks/AYRES_TEP/TEPHome.htm
Böck, R., & Almeida, F. (2018). Clarence Ayres, Ayresianos e a evolução do institucionalismo Vebleniano. Economia e Sociedade, 27(63), 381–407.
Bush, P.D. (1983). An exploration of the structural characteristics of a Veblen-Ayres-Foster defined institutional domain. Journal of Economic Issues, 17(1), 35–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1983.11504088
Bush, P.D. (1987). The theory of institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues, 21(3), 1075–1116.
Bush, P.D. (1989). The concept of “progressive” institutional change and its implications for economic policy formation. Journal of Economic Issues, 23(2), 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1989.11504911
Cypher, J.M. (2015). Emerging contradictions of Brazil’s neo-developmentalism: Precarious growth, redistribution, and deindustrialization. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(3), 617–648. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1071961
De Gregori, T.R. (1977). Technology and ceremonial behavior: Aspects of institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 11(4), 861–870. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1977.11503489
Dugger, W.M. (1995). Veblenian institutionalism: The changing concepts of inquiry. Journal of Economic Issues, 29(4), 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1995.11505737
Elsner, W. (2012). The theory of institutional change revisited: The institutional dichotomy, its dynamic, and its policy implications in a more formal analysis. Journal of Economic Issues, 46(1), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460101
Elsner, W. (2018). Complexity and innovation: Why beneficial effects of innovation highly depend. Journal of Institutional Studies, 10(4), 007–019. https://doi.org/10.17835/2076-6297.2018.10.4.007-019
Elsner, W., Hocker, G., & Schwardt, H. (2010). Simplistic vs. complex organization: Markets, hierarchies, and networks in an organizational triangle — A simple heuristic to analyze real-world organizational forms. Journal of Economic Issues, 44(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624440101
Ezzamel, M. (1997). Accounting, control, and accountability: Preliminary evidence from ancient Egypt. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 8(6), 563–601. https://doi.org/10.1006/cpac.1997.0123
Foster, J.F. (1981a). John Dewey e valor econômico. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(4), 871–897.
Foster, J.F. (1981b). The effect of technology on institutions. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(4), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1981.11503914
Garcia-Murillo, M., & MacInnes, I. (2019). AI’s path to the present and the painful transitions along the way. Digital Policy, Regulation and Governance, 21(3), 305–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/DPRG-09-2018-0051
Giannakouros, P., & Chen, L. (2018). A problem-solving approach to data analysis for economics. Forum for Social Economics, 47(1), 87–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/07360932.2015.1078737
Grolleau, G., Lakhal, T., & Mzoughi, N. (2008). An introduction to the economics of fake degrees. Journal of Economic Issues, 42(3), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2008.11507173
Hall, J., Lacasa, I.D., & Günther, J. (2011). Path dependence and QWERTY’s lock-in: Toward a Veblenian interpretation. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(2), 457–464. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450223
Hamilton, W.H. (1919). The institutional approach to economic theory. The American Economic Review, 9(1), 309–318.
Heinrich, T. (2017). The narrow and broad approaches to evolutionary modeling in economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 51(2), 383–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2017.1320912
Hielscher, S., Pies, I., & Valentinov, V. (2012). How to foster social progress: An ordonomic perspective on progressive institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues, 46(3), 779–798. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624460310
Junker, L. (1979). Genuine or spurious institutionalism? Veblen and Ayres seen from a neo-classical perspective raise the question. American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 38(2), 207–223.
Junker, L. (1982). The ceremonial-instrumental dichotomy in institutional analysis: The nature, scope and radical implications of the conflicting systems. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 41(2), 141–150.
Junker, L. (1983). The conflict between the scientific-technological process and malignant ceremonialism. The American Journal of Economics and Sociology, 42(3), 341–352.
Lacasa, I.D. (2014). Ceremonial encapsulation and the diffusion of renewable energy technology in Germany. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(4), 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480410
Levy, Y., & Ellis, T.J. (2006). A systems approach to conduct an effective literature review in support of information systems research. Informing Science, 9, 181–211.
Marire, J. (2015). The political economy of South African trout fisheries. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 47–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1013878
Maslov, A., & Volchik, V. (2014). Institutions and lagging development: The case of the Don army region. Journal of Economic Issues, 48(3), 727–742. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624480307
Minayo, M.C.S. (2002). El desafío del conocimiento: Investigación cualitativa en salud (9th Ed.).
Natarajan, T., Elsner, W., & Fullwiller, S.T. (2009). Institutional analysis and praxis: The social fabric matrix approach. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88741-8
Papadopoulos, G. (2015). Expanding on ceremonial encapsulation: The case of financial innovation. Journal of Economic Issues, 49(1), 127–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2015.1013883
Russo, P., & Guerreiro, R. (2017). Percepção sobre a sociomaterialidade das práticas de contabilidade gerencial. Revista de Administração de Empresas RAE, 57(6), 567–584.
Schlack, R.F. (1990). Urban economies and economic heterodoxy. Journal of Economic Issues, 24(1), 17–47.
Schwardt, H. (2011). The development trajectory of the Argentine economy since 1976: An Ayresian perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(2), 431–438. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450220
Stevenson, R. (2002). An ethical basis for institutional economics. Journal of Economic Issues, 36(2), 263–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2002.11506469
Strassmann, W.P. (1974). Technology: A culture trait, a logical category, or virtue itself? Journal of Economic Issues, 8(4), 671–687.
Swaney, J.A. (1981). Externality and community. Journal of Economic Issues, 15(3), 615–627. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1981.11503879
Swaney, J.A. (1986). A coevolutionary model of structural change. Journal of Economic Issues, 20(2), 393–401. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1986.11504510
Thompson, S. (2016). Worker cooperatives in the theory of the firm: Marx and Veblen on technological determinism. Journal of Economic Issues, 50(4), 913–939. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2016.1249743
Tilman, R. (1974). Value theory, planning, and reform: Ayres as incrementalist and utopian. Journal of Economic Issues, 8(4), 689–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.1974.11503223
Tubadji, A., & Nijkamp, P. (2018). Cultural corridors: An analysis of persistence in impacts on local development—A Neo-Weberian perspective on South-East Europe. Journal of Economic Issues, 52(1), 173–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2018.1430948
Valentinov, V. (2011). The meaning of nonprofit organization: Insights from classical institutionalism. Journal of Economic Issues, 45(4), 901–915. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624450408
Veblen, T. (1904). The theory of business enterprise. New York, NY: Charles Scribner’s Sons.
Veblen, T. (2007). The theory of the leisure class (Original work published 1899). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Vo, L.C., Culié, J.D., & Mounoud, E. (2016). Microfoundations of decoupling: From a coping theory perspective. Management (France), 19(4), 248–276. https://doi.org/10.3917/mana.194.0248
Waller, W.T. (1982). The evolution of the Veblenian dichotomy: Veblen, Hamilton, Ayres, and Foster. Journal of Economic Issues, 16(3), 757–771. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315494258
Webster, J., & Watson, R.T. (2002). Analyzing the past to prepare the future. MIS Quarterly, 26(2), xiii–xxiii.
Wisman, J., & Rozansky, J. (1991). The methodology of institutionalism revisited. Journal of Economic Issues, 25(3), 709–737.
Yetano, A. (2013). What drives the institutionalization of performance measurement and management in local government? Public Performance and Management Review, 37(1), 59–86. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370103
