Congress and Insider Trading: Breaking the Law and Making the Law

Authors

  • Kent Kauffman Purdue University-Fort Wayne

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v22i3.5304

Keywords:

accounting, finance, insider trading, Tipper-Tippee, misappropriation, fiduciary duty, Insider Trading Prohibition Act, STOCK Act

Abstract

This descriptive case study concerns the insider trading prosecution against former U.S. Representative Chris Collins, which resulted in his guilty plea in 2018, incarceration, and then release in December 2020, after receiving a pardon by outgoing president Donald Trump. It uses that case’s unique facts as a launching point and thematic device for summarizing illegal insider trading law, while emphasizing the difficulty in recognizing that insider trading law requires first that the wrongful trader have—and violate— a fiduciary duty. This is done by noting the influence federal case law has had on determining what insider trading is. The case study then continues the congressional line of analysis by focusing on the 2012 STOCK Act, which prohibits Congress from profiting off their access to inside information, as well as the Insider Trading Prohibition Act, current legislation that might become America’s first, criminal insider trading statute.

Downloads

Published

2022-08-01

How to Cite

Kauffman, K. (2022). Congress and Insider Trading: Breaking the Law and Making the Law. Journal of Accounting and Finance, 22(3). https://doi.org/10.33423/jaf.v22i3.5304

Issue

Section

Articles