The Equality Agenda: A Clear Case of Smoke and Mirrors
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jbd.v24i3.7321Keywords:
business diversity, equality, meritocracy, IQ testing, grammar schools, UK, USAAbstract
In his book “The madness of crowds: gender, race and identity,” the author Douglas Murray (2020) suggests that much of contemporary society is obsessed with a particular idea of diversity and equality that is all-encompassing and all-consuming. Embedded in current social policy, it is a view, he argues, that propagates the belief that ‘everybody is the same above the neck’ and that: ‘everybody is equal and […] given the right encouragement and opportunity, everybody can be whatever they want; that life is entirely about environment, opportunity, and privilege.’ In this work I trace the broad outline of the emerging equality agenda as it occurred in America and the UK with a particular emphasis on Northern Ireland and argue Murray (2020) is wrong in his assessment. The work highlights the differences between the two countries. It claims equality of opportunity, understood here as improved education, healthcare, childcare etc. and equality of outcome, are more rhetoric than reality.
References
Biggs, M. (2011). The Oxford handbook of analytical sociology. Oxford Handbooks Online. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199215362.013.13
Bolton, P. (2016). Grammar school statistics. House of Commons Library.
British and Irish Legal Information Institute. (2003). Shamoon v Chief Constable of the Royal Ulster Constabulary. Retrieved from https://www.bailii.org
Campbell, J. (2016). Beyond the silence: Women’s unheard voices from the Troubles. Guildhall Press.
Daly, E. (2000). Mister, are you a priest? Dublin: Four Courts Press.
Economic and Social Research Council. (2017). Briefing paper: Secondary modern schools. SESC.
Education Department Northern Ireland. (2018). Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.education-ni.gov.uk/publications/list-voluntary-grammar-schools
Equality and Human Rights Commission. (n.d.). Employment code of practice. Retrieved May 15, 2022, from https://www.equalityhumanrights.com/en/advice-and-guidance/equality-act-codes-practice
Graham, H., & Kelly, M.P. (2004). Health inequalities: Concepts, frameworks and policy. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from www.hda.nhs.uk/evidence
Herrnstein, J., & Murray, C. (1994). The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.
James MacCafferty, St Mary’s School. (n.d.). Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.jamesmaccafferty.com/st-marys-school
Jarret, T. (2011). The Equality Act 2010 and positive action. London: House of Commons Library.
McCann, E. (1980). War and an Irish town. London: Pluto Press.
Meredith, S. (2020). A society ... dividible into the blessed and the unblessed: Michael Young and meritocracy in postwar Britain. The Political Quarterly, pp. 1–9.
Midgley, M. (2018). What is philosophy for? London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Moloney, E. (2007). A secret history of the IRA (2nd Ed.). London: Penguin Books.
Murray, D. (2020). The madness of crowds: Gender, race and identity (2nd Ed.). London: Bloomsbury Continuum.
O’Neill, S., & O’Connor, R. (2020). Suicide in Northern Ireland: Epidemiology, risk factors, and prevention. The Lancet Psychiatry, 7, 538–546. Retrieved from www.thelancet.com/psychiastry
Pickett, K., & Wilkinson, R. (2009). The spirit level: Why equality is better for everyone. London: Penguin Books.
Sandel, M.J. (2021). The tyranny of merit. UK: Penguin Random House.
Young, M. (1958). The rise of the meritocracy 1870–2033: An essay on education and equality. London: Thames and Hudson.
