Crime, Violence, and Suspensions in Traditional Versus Public Charter Schools: Large Scale Evidence From One U.S. State

Authors

  • Edward J. Sabornie North Carolina State University
  • Alison A. Motsinger-Reif National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
  • Cathy L. Crossland North Carolina State University
  • Emily H. Griffith North Carolina State University
  • Mityl Biswas North Carolina State University
  • Hill M. Walker University of Oregon
  • William J. Hussey North Carolina Department of Public Instruction (Retired

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v17i5.3223

Keywords:

Leadership, Accountability, Ethics, school crime, school violence, school suspensions, charter schools, risk ratios

Abstract

We compared the student, school-related crime and violence in all the traditional public versus public charter schools in the state of North Carolina during school year 2015-2016. Results showed that traditional public schools demonstrated higher crime and violence rates than did public charter schools. Risk ratios related to lower rates of crime and violence in school greatly favored students attending public charter schools. Implications concerning the school-related crime and violence characteristics of two different types of schools, on a large scale, are provided.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-17

How to Cite

Sabornie, E. J., Motsinger-Reif, A. A., Crossland, C. L., Griffith, E. H., Biswas, M., Walker, H. M., & Hussey, W. J. (2020). Crime, Violence, and Suspensions in Traditional Versus Public Charter Schools: Large Scale Evidence From One U.S. State. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 17(5). https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v17i5.3223

Issue

Section

Articles