Reconfiguring the Kazakhstan Pension System: How Can Canadian and OECD Experience Be Helpful?

Authors

  • Almaz Tolymbek Delta International University
  • Bakhytgul Utegulova Academy of Civil Aviation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jmpp.v25i4.7399

Keywords:

management policy, pension system, retirement savings, pension asset portfolio, performance, asset structure, pension payout, pension market, rate of return, sustainability, group registered pension programs, individual registered pension programs, Kazakhstan, Canada, OECD

Abstract

This study examines the current state of Kazakhstan’s public pension system, comparing its performance and asset structure to OECD countries. It highlights structural and regulatory issues within the national pension market that hinder adequate retirement savings for the population. A key concern is the low real rate of return by the national pension fund, potentially jeopardizing its ability to meet future retirement needs amidst rising inflation. The study analyzes the Canadian pension system as a model, showcasing a three-layer structure that fosters diverse sources of pension benefits, ensuring sustainable income for retirees. It recommends considering group (employer-based) and private (individual) registered pension programs, common in developed countries, to generate additional pension income. Supportive legal and tax frameworks are crucial to encourage participation in these programs. Drawing on Canadian and OECD experiences, the study offers suggestions for reconfiguring Kazakhstan’s pension system to enhance its performance and sustainability, ultimately leading to higher pension payouts for future retirees.

References

Asian Development Bank. (2000). Reforming Kazakhstan’s pension system. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/28591/kaz-proj-brief-pension-system.pdf

Bédard-Pagé, G., Demers, A., Tuer, E., & Tremblay, M. (2016, June). Large Canadian Public Pension Funds: A Financial System Perspective. Retrieved from https://www.bankofcanada.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/fsr-june2016-bedard-page.pdf

Kazakhstan Unified Accumulative Pension Fund. (2021, December 1). Retrieved from https://www.enpf.kz/

Kursiv.kz. (2018, December 26). ЕНПФ: Казахстанцы самостоятельно смогут управлять своими пенсионными накоплениями. Retrieved from https://www.banker.kz/news/sapf-kazakhstanis-will-be-able-to-independently-ma/

OECD. (2021). Investment performance [Chapter in Pensions at a Glance 2021: OECD and G20 Indicators]. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1787/fe1db320-en

OECD. (2023). Pensions indicators (Edition 2022). OECD Pensions Statistics.

Office of the Superintendent of Financial Institutions (OSFI). (2016). Actuarial Report (27th) on the Canada Pension Plan (Revised). Retrieved from https://www.osfi-bsif.gc.ca/sites/default/files/documents/ais-sra-en.pdf

Preqin. (2017, February). Preqin Special Report: The Private Equity Top 100. Retrieved from https://docs.preqin.com/reports/Preqin-Special-Report-The-Private-Equity-Top-100-February-2017.pdf

UAPF. (2021). Dynamic of Fund's Indices 2021. Retrieved from https://www.enpf.kz/upload/medialibrary/db6/db6d3baa2ae8239376fd2c209ed8df0f.pdf

World Bank [distributor]. (n.d.). World Bank Global Economic Monitor [data set]. Retrieved from https://public.knoema.com/qhpqgye/world-bank-global-economic-monitor

Downloads

Published

2024-12-08

How to Cite

Tolymbek , A., & Utegulova, B. (2024). Reconfiguring the Kazakhstan Pension System: How Can Canadian and OECD Experience Be Helpful?. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 25(4). https://doi.org/10.33423/jmpp.v25i4.7399

Issue

Section

Articles