Unpacking Team Task Performance: The Role of Positive and Negative Network Ties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jop.v25i1.7577Keywords:
organizational psychology, social networks, positive and negative ties, team task performanceAbstract
To accomplish key objectives, organizations frequently rely on work teams. This study of social networks and team performance sought to make two distinct contributions to theory: simultaneously researching positive and negative networks and integrating a more interdisciplinary research perspective. I investigated how the closure of instrumental and expressive networks combined to predict team intellective and judgmental task performance. A total of 386 participants in 66 teams participated, with 33 teams in each of the two task performance conditions. I found that an expressive (social identification) network had no relationship with intellective task performance, and that the relationship of the instrumental networks (shared leadership and advice) to intellective task performance was dependent upon the density of the task conflict network. I also found that instrumental networks (shared leadership and advice) were unrelated to judgmental task performance, and that the relationship of an expressive network (identification) to judgmental task performance was dependent upon the density of the social loafing network. While the findings from the present study provide a solid foundation for future research, much work remains before we fully understand the complex relationship between social networks and team performance.
References
Adler, P.S., & Kwon, S.-W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40.
Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.
Amabile, T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(5), 997–1013.
Amason, A.C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision-making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.
Ashforth, B.E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39.
Baldwin, T.T., Bedell, M.D., & Johnson, J.L. (1997). The social fabric of a team-based M.B.A. program: Network effects on student satisfaction and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 40(6), 1369–1397.
Balkundi, P., & Harrison, D.A. (2006). Ties, leaders, and time in teams: Strong inference about network structure’s effects on team viability and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 49, 49–68.
Balkundi, P., Kilduff, M., & Harrison, D.A. (2011). Centrality and charisma: Comparing how leader networks and attributions affect team performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(6), 1209–1222.
Borgatti, S.P., & Foster, P.C. (2003). The network paradigm in organizational research: A review and typology. Journal of Management, 29, 991–1014.
Borgatti, S.P., Everett, M.G., & Freeman, L.C. (2002). UCInet 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies.
Borgatti, S.P., Mehra, A., Brass, D.J., & Labianca, G. (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323(5916), 892–895.
Brass, D.J. (1984). Being in the right place: A structural analysis of individual influence in an organization. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29, 518–539.
Burt, R.S. (1997). The contingent value of social capital. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 339–365.
Burt, R.S. (2000). The network structure of social capital. In R.I. Sutton, & B.M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 22, pp. 345–423). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Campbell, J., & Stasser, G. (2006). The influence of time and task demonstrability on decision-making in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 37(3), 271–294.
Carson, J.B., Tesluk, P.E., & Marrone, J.A. (2007). Shared leadership in teams: An investigation of antecedent conditions and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 1217–1234.
Casciaro, T., Barsade, S.G., Edmondson, A.C., Gibson, C.B., Krackhardt, D., & Labianca, G. (2015). The integration of psychological and network perspectives in organizational scholarship. Organization Science, 26(4), 1162–1176.
Cornelius, C., & Boos, M. (2003). Enhancing mutual understanding in synchronous computer-mediated communication by training: Trade-offs in judgmental tasks. Communication Research, 30(2), 147–177.
de Wit, F.R.C., Greer, L.L., & Jehn, K.A. (2012). The paradox of intragroup conflict: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(360–390).
de Wit, F.R.C., Jehn, K.A., & Scheepers, D. (2013). Task conflict, information processing, and decision-making: The damaging effect of relationship conflict. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 122(2), 177–189.
DeDreu, C.K.W., & Weingart, L.R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 741–749.
Ensley, M.D., Pearson, A., & Pearce, C.L. (2003). Top management team process, shared leadership, and new venture performance: A theoretical model and research agenda. Human Resource Management Review, 13, 329–346.
George, J.M. (1992). Extrinsic and intrinsic origins of perceived social loafing in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 191–202.
Guzzo, R.A., & Shea, G.P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. In M.D. Dunette, & L.M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (2nd ed., Vol. 3, pp. 269–313). Consulting Psychologists Press.
Hackman, J.R., & Morris, C.G. (1975). Group tasks, group interaction processes, and group performance effectiveness: A review and proposed integration. Advances in Experimental Psychology, 8, 45–99. New York: Academic Press.
Han, J., Han, J., & Brass, D.J. (2014). Human capital diversity in the creation of social capital for team creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35(1), 54–71.
Hansen, M.T. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organizational subunits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 82–111.
Harkins, S., & Petty, R. (1982). Effects of task difficulty and task uniqueness on social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 1214–1229.
Ibarra, H. (1993). Personal networks of women and minorities in management: A conceptual framework. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 56–87.
Ilgen, D.R., Hollenbeck, J.R., Johnson, M., & Jundt, D. (2005). Teams in organizations: From input-process-output models to IMOI models. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 517–543.
Jehn, K.A. (1995). A multimethod examination of the benefits and detriments of intragroup conflict. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40, 256–282.
Jones, E.E., & Kelly, J.R. (2009). No pain, no gains: Negative mood leads to process gains in idea-generation groups. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 13(2), 75–88.
Kilduff, M., & Brass, D.J. (2010). Organizational social network research: Core ideas and key debates. Academy of Management Annals, 4, 317–357.
Krackhardt, D. (1999). The ties that torture: Simmelian tie analysis in organizations. In S.B. Andrews, & D. Knoke (Eds.), Research in the sociology of organizations (Vol. 16, pp. 216–239). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Labianca, G., & Brass, D.J. (2006). Exploring the social ledger: Negative relationships and negative asymmetry in social networks in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 31, 596–614.
Latané, B., Williams, K., & Harkins, S. (1979). Many hands make light the work: The causes and consequences of social loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 822–832.
Laughlin, P.R. (1980). Social combination processes of cooperative, problem-solving groups on verbal intellective tasks. In M. Fishbien (Ed.), Progress in social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 127–155). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Laughlin, P.R. (1996). Group decision making and collective induction. In E.H. Witte, & J H. Davis (Eds.), Understanding Group Behavior: Consensual Action by Small Groups (Vol. 1, pp. 61–80). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
LePine, J.A., Methot, J.R., Crawford, E.R., & Buckman, B.R. (2012). A model of positive relationships in teams: The role of instrumental, friendship, and multiplex social network ties, Personal Relationships. The Effect on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-being (pp. 173–194). Routledge, New York.
Lincoln, J., & Miller, J. (1979). Work and friendship ties in organizations: A comparative analysis of relation networks. Administrative Science Quarterly, pp. 181173–194.199.
Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. In W.R. Scott, & J. Blake (Eds.), Annual Review of Sociology (Vol. 16). Palo Alto, CA: Annual Reviews.
Mathieu, J.E., Maynard, M.T., Rapp, T.L., & Gilson, L.L. (2008). Team effectiveness 1997-2007: A review of recent advancements and a glimpse into the future. Journal of Management, 34, 410–476.
Mehra, A., Smith, B.R., Dixon, A.L., & Robertson, B. (2006). Distributed leadership in teams: The network of leadership perceptions and team performance. Leadership Quarterly, 17, 232–245.
Moldjord, C., & Iversen, A. (2015). Developing vulnerability trust in temporary high performance teams. Team Performance Management, 21(5/6), 231–246.
Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.
Newell, S., Tansley, C., & Huang, J. (2004). Social capital and knowledge integration in an ERP project team: The importance of bridging AND bonding. British Journal of Management, 15, S43–S57.
Oh, H., Chung, M.-H., & Labianca, G. 2004. Group social capital and group effectiveness: The role of informal socializing ties. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 860–875.
Oh, H., Labianca, G., & Chung, M.-H. (2006). A multilevel model of group social capital. Academy of Management Review, 31(3), 569–582.
Pearce, C.L. & Sims, H.P., Jr. (2002). Vertical versus shared leadership as predictors of the effectiveness of change management teams: An examination of aversive, directive, transactional, transformational, and empowering leader behaviors. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 6(2), 179–197.
Pearce, C.L., & Conger, J.A. (2003). All those years ago: the historical underpinnings of shared leadership. In C.L. Pearce, & J.A. Conger (Eds.), Shared leadership: Reframing the how’s and why’s of leadership (pp. 1–18). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Price, K.H., Harrison, D.A., & Gavin, J.H. (2006). Withholding inputs in team contexts: Member composition, interaction Processes, evaluation structure, and social loafing. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(6), 1375–1384.
Reagans, R., Zuckerman, E., & McEvily, B. (2004). How to make the team: Social networks vs. demography as criteria for designing effective teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 101–133.
Reddy, W.B., & Byrnes, A. (1972). Effects of interpersonal group composition on the problem-solving behavior of middle managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 56(6), 516–517.
Rico, R., Sánchez-Manzanares, M., Gil, F., & Gibson, C. (2008). Team implicit coordination processes: A team knowledge-based approach. Academy of Management Review, 33(1), 163–184.
Roberson, Q.M., & Williamson, I.O. (2012). Justice in self-managing teams: The role of social networks in the emergence of procedural justice climates. Academy of Management Journal, 55(3), 685–701.
Scott, J. (2000). Social Network Analysis: A Handbook (Second ed.). Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Skowronski, J.J., & Carlston, D.E. (1989). Negativity and extremity biases in impression formation: A review of explanations. Psychological Bulletin, 105(1), 131.
Soltis, S.M., Agneessens, F., Sasovova, Z., & Labianca, G. (2013). A social network perspective on turnover intentions: The role of distributive justice and social support. Human Resource Management, 52(4), 561–584.
Sparrowe, R.T., Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J., & Kraimer, M.L. (2001). Social networks and the performance of individuals and groups. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 316–325.
Steiner, I.D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Stevenson, W., & Gilly, M. (1991). Information processing and problem solving: The migration of problems through formal positions and network ties. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 918–928.
Turner, J.C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), The Social Dimension: European Developments in Social Psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 518–538). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Venkataramani, V., Labianca, G., & Grosser, T. (2013). Positive and negative workplace relationships, social satisfaction, and organizational attachment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(6), 1028–1039.
Wang, Z., Tjosvold, D., Chen, Y.-f., & Luo, Z. (2014). Cooperative goals and team performance: Examining the effects of advice network. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31(3), 835–852.
Yukl, G.A. (1998). Leadership in organizations (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice-Hall.
Zhang, Z., & Peterson, S.J. (2011). Advice networks in teams: The role of transformational leadership and members’ core self-evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(5), 1004–1017.
