Traditional Ecological Views and Practices of the Miao People on Hainan Island: Formation, Structure, and Contemporary Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/eh82d191Keywords:
business anthropology, Hainan Miao, ecological anthropology, traditional ecological knowledge, animism, tropical rainforest, co-managementAbstract
This paper examines the formation, structure, and contemporary transformation of traditional ecological views among the Miao (Hmong) people on Hainan Island, China, adopting an ecological anthropology paradigm and drawing on multi-sited fieldwork conducted across Miao-inhabited and Li–Miao mixed communities in Baisha, Qiongzhong, Wuzhishan, Ledong, Changjiang, Chengmai, and Qionghai in Hainan Province between 2022 and 2025. Grounded in Berkes's (1999, 2012) four-tier Traditional Ecological Knowledge framework and Rappaport's (1968) ritual ecology perspective, the study documents how Hainan Miao ecological thought is rooted in a dual philosophical foundation of Daoist cosmology and animistic indigenous beliefs, and how this worldview has undergone three historical phases of transformation: a relatively closed traditional phase (Ming dynasty to 1949), a state-integration and market-shock phase (1949-2000), and a contemporary ecological civilization phase (2000-present) anchored by the establishment of Hainan Tropical Rainforest National Park in 2021. The paper presents rich ethnographic cases from Wengcun Miao Village, Shuiman Township, Xiangtu Village, and Youyi Village, illuminating the Miao ecological knowledge system across three dimensions: ethnobotany, ethnozoology, and ecological governance institutions. The community-level institutional apparatus-comprising the village elder (yangge) authority, the customary langgui code, and the chicken-feather-letter (jimaoxin) whistleblowing mechanism-is analyzed as a socially enforced ecological regulation system that has maintained biodiversity and forest cover across centuries. The paper further argues that Miao TEK exhibits dynamic adaptive capacity rather than static cultural heritage, and calls for its formal integration into the national park co-management frameworks and rural revitalization policy.
References
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please review our Copyright Notice.