“The Cost of Caring": How Veterinary Students Navigate Motivation, Mentorship, and the NAVLE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/zgvx8t81Keywords:
management, Strengths and Opportunities Report (S&O), Expectancy-Value Framework (EV-F), veterinary students, North American Veterinary Licensing Examination (NAVLE)Abstract
This study used semi-structured qualitative interviews and focus groups with 29 veterinary students to explore, through a modified Expectancy-Value Framework, how they valued resources such as “Strengths and Opportunities” reports and faculty mentorship while preparing for the North American Veterinary Licensing Exam. Results showed that students valued mentorship and reports, but expressed concerns about time-management, inconsistent feedback, and the effectiveness of available resources. Despite high intrinsic motivation, driven by career goals, struggles with time and effort persisted. To boost confidence and performance, institutions should offer tailored support, stronger faculty mentoring, personalized feedback, and resources aligned with academic and future needs.
References
Adams, C.L., & Kurtz, S. (2012). Coaching and feedback: Enhancing communication teaching and learning in veterinary practice settings. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 39(3), 217–228. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0512-038r
American Veterinary Medical Association. (2023). COE accreditation policies and procedures: Requirements (Standard 11). Retrieved from https://www.avma.org/education/center-for-veterinary-accreditation/accreditation-policies-and-procedures-avma-council-education-coe
Atkinson, J.W. (1957). Motivational determinants of risk-taking behavior. Psychological Review, 64(6, Pt. 1), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043445
Black, L.S., Turnwald, G.H., & Meldrum, J.B. (2002). Outcomes assessment in veterinary medical education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 29(1), 28–31. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.29.1.28
Brady, R.L., Coker, A.O., Copeland, J.T., Gottlieb, H.B., Horlen, C., Smith, H.E., … Maize, D. (2016). The validation of a case-based, cumulative assessment and progressions examination. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 80(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe8019
Brooks, R. (2023, September 19). AVMA announces 11 newly proposed veterinary colleges. Farm Journal. Retrieved from https://www.bovinevetonline.com/news/industry/avma-announces-11-newly-proposed-veterinary-colleges
Burgess, A., van Diggele, C., & Mellis, C. (2018). Mentorship in the health professions: A review. The Clinical Teacher, 15(3), 197–202. https://doi.org/10.1111/tct.12756
Cake, M.A., Mansfield, C.F., McArthur, M.L., Zaki, S., & Matthew, S.M. (2019). An exploration of the career motivations stated by early-career veterinarians in Australia. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 46(4), 545–554. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0717-093r
Campbell, D.T., & Stanley, J.C. (1966). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for research. R. McNally. Retrieved from https://www.sfu.ca/~palys/Campbell&Stanley-1959-Exptl&QuasiExptlDesignsForResearch.pdf
Casimir, R., Linn, L., King, H., McKenzie, D., Thompson, M., & Perry, R.L. (2023). Simulation models: Another approach to teaching and learning. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 261(1), 47. https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.22.11.0509
Cernusca, D., Scott, D.M., & Friesner, D.L. (2017). Turning a problem into a solution: Instructional benefits of using ExamSoft to map multiple-choice responses. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 17(7). Retrieved from https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JHETP/article/view/1465/1395
Collins, H. (2005). Mentoring veterinary students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 32(3), 285–289. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.32.3.285
DeBiase, C.M., Beleh, M., Bostwick, J.R., Marshall, V.D., & Sweet, B.V. (2020). Evaluating pharmacy student use of ExamSoft strength and opportunity reports. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 12(12), 1431–1436. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2020.07.006
Eby, L.T., Allen, T.D., Evans, S.C., Ng, T., & DuBois, D.L. (2008). Does mentoring matter? A multidisciplinary meta-analysis comparing mentored and non-mentored individuals. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2007.04.005
Edmondson, K.M. (2004). Outcomes assessment as a component of good educational practice. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 31(2), 126–127. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.31.2.126
Elce, Y. (2021). The mentor-mentee relationship, addressing challenges in veterinary medicine together. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 51(5), 1099–1109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cvsm.2021.04.023
Feinberg, R.A., Jurich, D., Lord, J., Case, H., & Hawley, J. (2018). Examining the validity of the North American Veterinary Licensing Examination (NAVLE) time constraints. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 45(3), 381–387. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0217-026r
Fiala, J. (2023, November 15). University of Arizona struggles in quest for full accreditation. VIN News. Retrieved from https://news.vin.com/default.aspx?pid=210&Id=11789099&f5=1#:~:text=*%20The%20University%20of%20Arizona%20College,the%20class%20of%202023%20passed.
Filho, P.T.H., Cecílio-Fernandes, D., Norcia, L.F., Sandars, J., Anderson, M.B., & Bicudo, A.M. (2022). Reduction in final year medical students’ knowledge during the COVID-19 pandemic: Insights from an interinstitutional progress test. Frontiers in Education, 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.1033732
Finney, S.J., & Horst, S.J. (2019). Standards, standards, standards: Mapping professional standards for outcomes assessment to assessment practice. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 56(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1080/19496591.2018.1559171
Foote, D. (2015). Mentoring support for students. Veterinary Record Careers, 176(16). https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.h1967
Freeman, D., Hodgson, K., & Darling, M. (2022). Mentoring new veterinary graduates for transition to practice and lifelong learning. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 49(4), 409–413. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2021-0036
Fuentealba, C. (2011). The role of assessment in the student learning process. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 38(2), 157–162. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.38.2.157
Grakh, K., Panwar, D., Jadhav, V.J., Khurana, R., Yadav, D., Bangar, Y.C., … Kumar, K. (2022). Identification and assessment of stress and associated stressors among veterinary students in India using a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.1059610
Hafen, M., Drake, A.S., & Elmore, R.G. (2023). Predictors of psychological well-being among veterinary medical students. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 50(3), 297–304. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2021-0133
Hanson, A.E., P'Pool, A., Starr, M.C., & Byrne, B.J. (2021). Decline in pediatric shelf examination performance during COVID-19. Cureus. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.18453
Hecker, K., & Violato, C. (2009). Validity, reliability, and defensibility of assessments in veterinary education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 36(3), 271–275. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.36.3.271
Huebner, B. (2022). Exam review versus categorical feedback, which is better for improved scores in doctor of physical therapy students (Doctoral dissertation, Bellarmine University). Bellarmine University: Graduate Theses, Dissertations, and Capstones. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.bellarmine.edu/tdc/121
Hunter, A.D., & Brewer, J. (2015). Designing multimethod research (1st ed.). Oxford University Press.
Inpanbutr, N., Marsh, A.E., Rhodes-DiSalvo, M., Richards, J.E., El-Khoury, C., Frasure, C.V., … Motta, T. (2020). Using the digital platform ExamSoft in veterinary anatomy and parasitology assessments in written and laboratory components. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(2), 148–157. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0418-045r
International Council for Veterinary Assessment. (2023). 2023 annual report for licensing boards. Retrieved from https://www.icva.net/image/cache/2023_ICVA_Report_to_Licensing_Boards.pdf
Johansen, M.O., Eliassen, S., & Jeno, L.M. (2023). The bright and dark side of autonomy: How autonomy support and thwarting relate to student motivation and academic functioning. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1153647
Jug, R., Jiang, X., & Bean, S.M. (2019). Giving and receiving effective feedback: A review article and how-to guide. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, 143(2), 244–250. https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-RA
Karabulut-Ilgu, A., & Burzette, R.G. (2023). An exploratory study of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic disruptions on veterinary medical education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme-2023-0049
Karibyan, A., & Sabnis, G. (2021). Students' perceptions of computer-based testing using ExamSoft. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 13(8), 935–944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2021.06.018
Khalaf, B.K., & Zin, Z.B.M. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545–564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
Knekta, E., & Eklöf, H. (2014). Modeling the test-taking motivation construct through investigation of psychometric properties of an expectancy-value-based questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(7), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282914551956
Kochevar, D.T. (2004). The critical role of outcomes assessment in veterinary medical accreditation. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 31(2), 116–119. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.31.2.116
Larkin, M. (2024, March 6). Number of NAVLE test takers increase as overall scores decrease. American Veterinary Medical Association. Retrieved from https://www.avma.org/news/number-navle-test-takers-increase-overall-scores-decrease
Loh, E.K.Y. (2019). What we know about expectancy-value theory, and how it helps to design a sustained motivating learning environment. System, 86, 102119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2019.102119
Malau-Aduli, B.S., Preston, R., Adu, M., Alele, F., Gratani, M., Drovandi, A., & Heslop, I. (2019). Pharmacy students’ perceptions of assessment and its impact on learning. Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning, 11(6), 571–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cptl.2019.02.020
Mayring, P. (2022). Qualitative content analysis: A step-by-step guide (1st ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
McArthur, M.L., Matthew, S.M., Brand, C.P.B., Andrews, J., Fawcett, A., & Hazel, S. (2019). Cross-sectional analysis of veterinary student coping strategies and stigma in seeking psychological help. Veterinary Record, 184(23), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/vr.105042
Melovitz Vasan, C.A., DeFouw, D.O., Holland, B.K., & Vasan, N.S. (2018). Analysis of testing with multiple choice versus open-ended questions: Outcome-based observations in an anatomy course. Anatomical Sciences Education, 11(3), 254–261. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1739
Meyer, A.N.D., Upadhyay, D.K., Collins, C.A., Fitzpatrick, M.H., Kobylinski, M., Bansal, A.B., … Singh, H. (2021). A program to provide clinicians with feedback on their diagnostic performance in a learning health system. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety, 47(2), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcjq.2020.08.014
Mossop, L.H., & Cobb, K. (2013). Teaching and assessing veterinary professionalism. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 40(3), 223–232. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0113-016r
O’Mara, D., Quinnell, R., Rothnie, I., Davies, L., & Pye, M. (2014). ExamBank: A pedagogic and administrative system to provide effective student feedback and stable assessment across disciplines. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22(3). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rosanne_Quinnell/publication/267633223_ExamBank_a_Pedagogic_and_Administrative_System_to_Provide_Effective_Student_Feedback_and_Stable_Assessment_Across_Disciplines/links/545563eb0cf2bccc490ccc86.pdf
Onwuegbuzie, A.J., Dickinson, W.B., Leech, N.L., & Zoran, A.G. (2009). A qualitative framework for collecting and analyzing data in Focus Group Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690900800301
Parker, A., Watson, E., Dyck, N., & Carey, J.P. (2021). Traditional versus open-book exams in remote course delivery: A narrative review of the literature. Proceedings of the CEEA Conference. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi0.14845
Pelzer, J.M., Hodgson, J.L., & Werre, S.R. (2014). Veterinary students’ perceptions of their learning environment as measured by the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure. BMC Research Notes, 7, 170. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-7-170
Philpott, M., O’Reilly, K., Bermudez, L., de Morais, H., & Filtz, T.M. (2022). Professional student education and training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Biosafety, 27(3), 144–152. https://doi.org/10.1089/apb.2022.0017
Plante, I., O’Keefe, P.A., & Théorêt, M. (2012). The relation between achievement goal and expectancy-value theories in predicting achievement-related outcomes: A test of four theoretical conceptions. Motivation and Emotion, 37(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-012-9282-9
Reder, M., & Crimmins, C. (2018). Why assessment and faculty development need each other: Notes on using evidence to improve student learning. Research & Practice in Assessment, 13, 15–19. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1206357.pdf
Routh, J., Paramasivam, S.J., Cockcroft, P., Nadarajah, V.D., & Jeevaratnam, K. (2022). Stakeholder perspectives on veterinary student preparedness for workplace clinical training—a qualitative study. BMC Veterinary Research, 18(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12917-022-03439-6
Royster, E., Morin, D.E., Molgaard, L., Wingert, D., & Fetrow, J. (2020). Methods used to assess student performance and course outcomes at the National Center of Excellence in Dairy Production Medicine education for veterinarians. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(3), 263–274. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1117-162r1
Rudolph, M.J., Daugherty, K.K., Ray, M.E., Shuford, V.P., Lebovitz, L., & DiVall, M.V. (2019). Best practices related to examination item construction and post-hoc review. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(7), 7204. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7204
Saldaña, J. (2013). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.
Salleh, S., Tasir, Z., & Shukor, N.A. (2012). Web-based simulation learning framework to enhance students’ critical thinking skills. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 372–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.044
Simpson, L.P. (2016). Perception of ExamSoft feedback reports as autonomy-support for learners (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Morehead State University). Morehead State Theses and Dissertations, 12. Retrieved from https://scholarworks.moreheadstate.edu/msu_theses_dissertations/12
Simpson, L., Jones, M., & Taylor, S. (2018). Evaluating the use of automated feedback on student motivation. INNOVATIONS in Pharmacy, 9(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24926/iip.v9i2.984
Varnum, A.T., West, A.B., & Hendrickson, D.A. (2020). A competency-guided veterinary curriculum review process. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 47(2), 137–147. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1217-183r1
VERBI Software. (2024). MAXQDA (Version 24.4.1) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://www.maxqda.com
Warman, S.M., Laws, E.J., Crowther, E., & Baillie, S. (2014). Initiatives to improve feedback culture in the final year of a veterinary program. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 41(2), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.1013-142r
Weldon, D. (2021). School of Pharmacy. William Carey University. Retrieved from https://www.wmcarey.edu/school/pharmacy
Weston, J.F., Gardner, D., & Yeung, P. (2017). Stressors and protective factors among veterinary students in New Zealand. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 44(1), 22–28. https://doi.org/10.3138/jvme.0116-014r1
Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2010). Students’ achievement values, goal orientations, and interest: Definitions, development, and relations to achievement outcomes. Developmental Review, 30(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2009.12.001
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J.S. (2000). Expectancy–value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
Xu, S. (2022). Construct-oriented or goal-motivated? Interpreting test preparation of a high-stakes writing test from the perspective of expectancy-value theory. Frontiers in Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.846413
Yin, R.K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Zheng, M., & Bender, D. (2018). Evaluating outcomes of computer-based classroom testing: Student acceptance and impact on learning and exam performance. Medical Teacher, 41(1), 75–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2018.1441984
Zong, Z., Schunn, C.D., & Wang, Y. (2021). Learning to improve the quality peer feedback through experience with peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(6), 973–992. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1833179
Zoom Video Communications, Inc. (2024). Zoom Workplace (Version 6.0) [Computer software]. Retrieved from https://zoom.us
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Please review our Copyright Notice.
