Prosecuting Medicare Fraudsters: Lessons Learned from Recent Litigation

Authors

  • Stephen Blythe College of Business Administration Tarleton State University
  • James Goodpasture College of Business Administration Tarleton State University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v14i4.1495

Keywords:

Leadership, Ethics, Accountability

Abstract

The researchers investigated the 41 appellate cases of Medicare fraud that were decided by the 11 circuits of the United States Court of Appeals during the past three years (January 2014 through December 2016). A study of those cases led to these conclusions: (1) the crimes for which Medicare fraudsters are most often prosecuted are healthcare fraud, conspiracy to commit healthcare fraud, payment of kickbacks, and identity theft; (2) Medicare fraudsters were personnel in all aspects of healthcare; (3) types of Medicare fraud included overbilling for services and billing for services to fake patients; and (4) Medicare fraud convicts received variable prison sentences.

Downloads

Published

2017-12-01

How to Cite

Blythe, S., & Goodpasture, J. (2017). Prosecuting Medicare Fraudsters: Lessons Learned from Recent Litigation. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v14i4.1495

Issue

Section

Articles