Influential Article Review - Digital vs Physical Market Spatial Variability

Authors

  • Aaron Cole
  • Vernon Roy

Keywords:

Spatial competition, Online retailing, Browse-and-switch behavior, Consumer heterogeneity, Consumer behavior, China, Circular city model

Abstract

This paper examines commerce, We present insights from a highly influential paper. Here are the highlights from this paper This paper develops a game-theoretic spatial model featuring consumer heterogeneity in online vs. offline retailers’ spatial competition. We find that consumers’ browse-and-switch behavior intensifies the competition because both offline and online retailers’ price and profit decline when the behavior occurs, but it is not necessarily a threat to offline retailers especially when the product relates more closely to experience. We consider six equilibrium scenarios for different combinations of consumer behaviors when considering a hybrid retailer. The analysis taking consumer heterogeneity into consideration shows that the hybrid retailer operating both online and offline is not always the winner. Particularly, the business opportunity for the offline retailer lies in consumers’ willingness to pay in store, and whether the retailer launches an online store depends on the type of products and services provided. For our overseas readers, we then present the insights from this paper in Spanish, French, Portuguese, and German.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-13

How to Cite

Cole, A., & Roy, V. (2019). Influential Article Review - Digital vs Physical Market Spatial Variability. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 13(6). Retrieved from https://articlegateway.com/index.php/JMDC/article/view/3466

Issue

Section

Articles