The Notice-and-Choice Privacy Gamble: Game Theory, Consumer Agency, and Implications for GDPR

Authors

  • Matt Hettche Christopher Newport University
  • Dae-Hee Kim Christopher Newport University
  • Michael J. Clayton American University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v17i3.6555

Keywords:

marketing, development, consumer agency, game theory, general data protection regulation, notice-and-choice privacy notices

Abstract

This article provides a theoretical basis for why the notice-and-choice model for protecting consumer information privacy might still be considered a viable policy approach despite evidence that privacy notices are often ignored, difficult to read, and misunderstood by consumers. Drawing from several well-known game-theoretic models that map closely to an online consumer’s notice-and-choice context, we outline a rational choice model for consumer online privacy and discuss its relevance for the EU’s General Data Protection Regulations [GDPR]. We argue that an online consumer’s notice-and-choice privacy gamble is a reasonable bet when constrained by competition and the presence of meaningful regulation.

Downloads

Published

2023-11-23

How to Cite

Hettche, M., Kim, D.-H., & Clayton, M. J. (2023). The Notice-and-Choice Privacy Gamble: Game Theory, Consumer Agency, and Implications for GDPR. Journal of Marketing Development and Competitiveness, 17(3). https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v17i3.6555

Issue

Section

Articles