YouTube Influencers Fostering Audience Engagement Through Parasocial Relationships
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jmdc.v18i2.7034Keywords:
marketing, development, lifestyle influencers, YouTube, influencer marketing, parasocial relationships, content analysisAbstract
As the growing popularity of lifestyle YouTube influencers risks the possibility of over-saturation of sponsored content on YouTube, brands should determine the effectiveness of influencers and identify the characteristics of lifestyle YouTube influencers to make sponsored content successful. Drawing upon parasocial relationship theory, this study incorporates match-up hypothesis and source credibility theories to determine characteristics of lifestyle YouTube influencers and their content that increase their audience engagement and makes social media influencer marketing effective. Using the content analysis of lifestyle YouTube influencers, this study reveals that micro-influencers have a higher engagement with their audience through parasocial relationships than mega and macro-influencers.
References
Aluri, A., & Tucker, E. (2015). Social influence and technology acceptance: The use of personal social media as a career enhancement tool among college students. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education, 27(2), 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10963758.2015.1033103
Arnold, A. (2017). Why YouTube stars influence millennials more than traditional celebrities. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/under30network/2017/06/20/why-youtube-stars-influence-millennials-more-than-traditional-celebrities/#10a9134c48c6
Arora, A., Bansal, S., Kandpal, C., Aswani, R., & Dwivedi, Y. (2019). Measuring social media influencer index- Insights from Facebook, Twitter and Instagram. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 49, 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.03.012
Assael, H. (1984). Consumer Behavior and Market Action. Boston, MA: Kent Publishing Company.
Bergstrom, T., & Backman, L. (2013). Marketing and PR in social media. Stockholms University. Retrieved from http://www.divaportal.org/smash/get/diva2:625012/FULLTEXT01.pdf
Bi, N.C., & Zhang, R. (2022). I will buy what my ‘friend’ recommends: The effects of parasocial relationships, influencer credibility and self-esteem on purchase intentions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 17, 157–175. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-08-2021-0214
Boerman, S. (2020). The effects of the standardized Instagram disclosure for micro- and meso-influencers. Computers in Human Behavior, 103, 199–207. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.09.015
Boerman, S., Willemsen, L., & Van Der Aa, E. (2017). This post is sponsored: Effects of sponsorship disclosure on persuasion knowledge and electronic word of mouth in the context of Facebook. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 38, 82–92. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.12.002
Campbell, C., & Farrell, J.R. (2020). More than meets the eye: the functional components underlying influencer marketing. Business Horizons, 63(4), 469–479. doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2020.03.003
Cohen, E.L., & Tyler, W.J. (2016). Examining perceived distance and personal authenticity as mediators of the effects of ghost-tweeting on parasocial interaction. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 19(5), 342–346. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0657
Cole, T., & Leets, L. (1999). Attachment styles and intimate television viewing: Insecurely forming relationships in a parasocial way. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 16, 495–511.
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H.B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influence upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629–636.
Dhanesh, G., & Duthler, G. (n.d.). Relationship management through social media influencers: Effects of followers’ awareness of paid endorsement. Public Relations Review, 45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pubrev.2019.03.002
Ellis, E.G. (2018, November 29). Byeeeee, Logan Paul: Brands prefer ‘micro influencers’ now. Retrieved from https://www.wired.com/story/logan-paul-micro-influencers-youtube-instagram/
Farivar, S., Wang, F., & Yuan, Y. (2021). Opinion leadership vs. para-social relationship: Key factors in influencer marketing. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Sciences, 59, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102371
Ferchaud, A., Grzeslo, J., Orme, S., & Lagroue, J. (2018). Parasocial attributes and YouTube personalities: Exploring content trends across the most subscribed YouTube channels. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.041
Gerrath, M.H., & Usrey, B. (2020). The impact of influencer motives and commonness perceptions on follower reactions toward incentivized reviews. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38(3), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.09.010
Hall, K. (2016, September 30). The Importance of authenticity in influencer marketing. Retrieved from https://www.sproutcontent.com/blog/the-importance-ofauthenticity-in-influencer-marketing
Horton, D., & Wohl, R.R. (1956). Mass communication and para-social interaction: Observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry, 19, 215–229.
Hovland, C.I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635–650. doi: 10.1086/266350
Hovland, C.I. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Hu, X., Chen, X., & Davison, R.M. (2019). Social support, source credibility, social influence, and impulsive purchase behavior in social commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 23(3), 297–327. doi: 10.1080/10864415.2019.1619905
Hwang, Y., & Jeong, S. (2016). This is a sponsored blog post, but all opinions are my own: The effects of sponsorship disclosure on responses to sponsored blog posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 62, 528–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.04.02
Johansen, I., & Guldvik, C. (2017). Influencer marketing and purchase intentions: How does influencer marketing affect purchase intentions? [Master’s Thesis, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen].
Jones, D.A., Shultz, J.W., & Chapman, D.S. (2006). Recruiting through job advertisements: The effects of cognitive elaboration on decision making. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 14, 167–179.
Kessel, P.V. (2019, December 14). 10 facts about Americans and YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2019/12/04/10-facts-about-americans-and-youtube/
Khan, M.L. (2017) Social media engagement: what motivates user participation and consumption on YouTube? Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 236–247. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.024
Ki, C.W., & Kim, Y.K. (2019). The mechanism by which social media influencers persuade consumers: The role of consumers’ desire to mimic. Psychology & Marketing, 36(10), 905–922. doi:10.1002/mar.21244
Ladhari, R., Massa, E., & Skandrani, H. (2020, May). YouTube vloggers’ popularity and influence: The roles of homophily, emotional attachment, and expertise. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Sciences, 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.102027
Lee, J.E., & Watkins, B. (2016). YouTube vloggers’ influence on consumer luxury brand perceptions and intentions. Journal of Business Research, 69(12). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.17
Leite, F.P., & Baptista, P.P. (2021). Influencers’ intimate self-disclosure and its impact on consumers’ self-brand connections: Scale development, validation, and application. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 16(3), 420–437. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-05-2020-0111
Li, C. (2013). Persuasive messages on information system acceptance: A theoretical extension of elaboration likelihood model and social influence theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 29, 264–275.
MacCracken, G. (1989). Who is the celebrity endorser? Cultural foundations of the endorsement process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 310–321.
Malodia, S., Singh, P., Goyal, V., & Sengupta, A. (2017). Measuring the impact of brand-celebrity personality congruence on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Communications, 23(5), 493–512. doi: 10.1080/13527266.2017.1322125
McGuire, W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In G. Lindzey, & E. Aronson (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 233–346). New York, NY: Random House.
Nazerali, S. (2017, October). Collaborations with YouTube influencers. Think with Google. Retrieved from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/consumer-insights/youtube-influencer-marketing-rulebook
O’Neil-Hart, C., & Blumenstein, H. (2016). Why YouTube stars are more influential than traditional celebrities. Retrieved from https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/consumer-insights/youtube-stars-influence/
O’Reilly, K., Macmillan, A., Mumuni, A.G., & Lancendorfer, K.M. (2016). Extending our understanding of eWOM impact: The role of source credibility and message relevance. Journal of Internet Commerce, 15(2), 77–96. doi: 10.1080/15332861.2016.1143215
Rohrlich, J. (2020, March 5). What fake reviews can mean for your business. Retrieved from
https://www.bazaarvoice.com/blog/what-fake-reviews-can-mean-for-your-business/
Roma, P., & Aloini, D. (2019). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across social media? Evidence reloaded. Journal of Business Research, 96, 322–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.11.055
Shepherd, J. (2024, February 26). 23 Essential YouTube Statistics You Need to Know in 2024. Retrieved from https://thesocialshepherd.com/blog/youtube-statistics#:~:text=YouTube%20has%202.70%20billion%20monthly,122%20million%20users%20per%20day
Smith, A.N., Fischer, E., & Yongjian, C. (2012). How does brand-related user-generated content differ across YouTube, Facebook, and Twitter? Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26(2), 102–113. doi:10.1016/j.intmar.2012.01.002
Stubb, C., & Colliander, J. (2019, September). This is not sponsored content: The effects of impartiality disclosure and e-commerce landing pages on consumer responses to social media influencer posts. Computers in Human Behavior, 98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.04.024
Swant, M. (2017, January 25). Twitter says users now trust influencers nearly as much as their friends. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/digital/twitter-saysusers-now-trust-influencers-nearly-much-their-friends-171367/
Utz, S. (2015). The function of self-disclosure on social network sites: not only intimate, but also positive and entertaining self-disclosures increase the feeling of connection. Computers in Human Behavior, 45, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.11.076
Van Doorn, J., Lemon, K.N., Mittal, V., Nass, S., Pick, D., Pirner, P., & Verhoef, P.C. (2010). Customer engagement behavior: Theoretical foundations and research Directions. Journal of Service Research, 13(3), 253–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670510375599
Venkatesh, V., & Brown, S.A. (2001). A longitudinal investigation of personal computers in homes: Adoption determinants and emerging challenges. MIS Quarterly, 25, 71–102.
Wissman, B. (2018, March 2). Micro-influencers: The marketing force of the future? Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/barrettwissman/2018/03/02/micro-influencers-the-marketing-force-of-the-future/?sh=567412426707
Wu, P.C., & Wang, Y.C. (2011). The influences of electronic word‐of‐mouth message appeal and message source credibility on brand attitude. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 23(4), 448–472. doi: 10.1108/13555851111165020
Wu, Y., Ngai, E.W., Wu, P., & Wu, C. (2020). Fake online reviews: Literature review, synthesis, and directions for future research. Decision Support Systems, 132, 113280. doi:10.1016/j.dss.2020.113280
Zhou, S., Barnes, L., McCormick, H., & Cano, M. (2020). Social media influencers’ narrative strategies to create eWOM: A theoretical contribution. International Journal of Information Management, 59, 102293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102293
