Examining Successful Management Practices Among Senior Women Using Artificial Intelligence Technology

Authors

  • Leslie Gilliam Walden University
  • Teresa Lao Walden University
  • Chikwendu Nweke Walden University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i3.7252

Keywords:

innovation, sustainability, artificial intelligence (AI) technology, decision-making, emerging technologies, fourth industrial revolution (4IR), information systems (IS), information technology (IT), leadership, machine learning, management technology, phenomenology, senior business leaders, successful business organization process, procedures transcendental phenomenology

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology innovations can intensify the digital ecosystem affecting management practices and the quality of life for female senior business leaders in the United States. The purpose of this qualitative, transcendental phenomenology study was to examine the lived experiences that some female senior business leaders, ages 55 - 95, face using AI technology in decision-making. The conceptual framework are Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and the Mindspace Model. Data was collected through interviews with 12 successful female senior business leaders from nine industries in the US. The Van Kaam method, supported by Moustakas’ theoretical process, was used to analyze the data. Descriptive and inductive coding was used to categorize the themes: (a) AI technology is beneficial, (b) leadership and change management, (c) technology adaptation and acceptance, (d) decision-making and communication, and (e) information sharing and privacy. This study contributes to positive social change as a benefit to seniors by strengthening their AI technology decision-making practices, leadership, and community awareness in addition to influencing positive social change across management platforms.

References

Adu, P. (2019). A step-by-step guide to qualitative data coding. Routledge.

Akinola, S. (2021). What is the biggest benefit technology will have on ageing and longevity? World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/03/what-is-the-biggest-benefit-technology-ageing-longevity-global-future-council-tech-for-good/

Akkılıç, S. (2020). Understanding the representation of artificial intelligence and methodology across disciplines. Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture, 11(1), 109–113. https://doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00011_7

Di Pofi, J.A. (2002). Organizational diagnostics: Integrating qualitative and quantitative methodology. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 15(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534810210423053

Alexandrakis, D., Chorianopoulos, K., & Tselios, N. (2020). Older adults and Web 2.0 storytelling technologies: Probing the technology acceptance model through an age-related perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 36(17), 1623–1635. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2020.1768673

Alexandru, A., Coardos, D., & Tudora, E. (2019). Acceptance of the technologies deployed for the development of online public services and systems used by elderly. 2019 11th International Conference on Electronics, Computers and Artificial Intelligence (ECAI), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ECAI46879.2019.9042058

Altschuller, S., & Benbunan-Fich, R. (2010). Trust, performance, and the communication process in ad hoc decision-making virtual teams. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 16(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2010.01529.x

Anandakumar, K.R., & Ashwinkumar, U.M. (2012). A web-based patient support system using artificial intelligence to improve health monitoring and quality of life. 2012 Second International Conference on Advanced Computing & Communication Technologies, pp. 101–105. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCT.2012.16

Apostolescu, J., & Serban, C. (2022). Husserl, Kant, and transcendental phenomenology (1st Ed.). De Gruyter.

Arntz, M., Gregory, T., & Zierahn, U. (2016). The risk of automation for jobs in OECD countries: A comparative analysis. OECD Social, Employment and Migration Working Papers, No. 189. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/5jlz9h56dvq7-en

Babbie, E. (2017). Basics of Social Research (7th Ed.). Cengage Learning.

Barnett, D. (2023). Martin Heidegger. In Salem Press Biographical Encyclopedia. Retrieved from https://searchworks.stanford.edu/articles/ers__88801982

Bélisle-Pipon, J.C., Couture, V., Roy, M.C., Ganache, I., Goetghebeur, M., & Cohen, I.G. (2021). What makes artificial intelligence exceptional in health technology assessment? Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 736697.

Bennett, B. (2019). Technology, aging, and human rights: Challenges for an aging world. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101449

Berente, N., Bin Gu, Recker, J., & Santhanam, R. (2021). Managing artificial intelligence. MIS Quarterly, 45(3), 1433–1450. https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2021/16274

Bloomberg, L.D., & Volpe, M. (2019). Completing your qualitative dissertation: A roadmap from beginning to end (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.

Brey, P. (2018). The strategic role of technology in a good society. Technology in Society, 52, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2017.02.002

Burkholder, G.J., Crawford, L.M., & Cox, K.A. (2016). The scholar-practitioner’s guide to research design. Laureate Publishing.

Camp, N., Lewis, M., Hunter, K., Johnston, J., Zecca, M., Di Nuovo, A., & Magistro, D. (2021). Technology used to recognize activities of daily living in community-dwelling older adults. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(163), 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18010163

Campolo, A., Sanfilippo, M., Whittaker, M., & Crawford, K. (2018). AI Now 2017 report. AI Now 2017 Symposium and Workshop. New York University.

Checco, A., Bracciale, L., Loreti, P., Pinfield, S., & Bianchi, G. (2021). AI-assisted peer review. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 8(1), 1–11.

Cooper, A. (2019). How robots change the world. Economic Outlook, 43(3), 5–8. Oxford Economics. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0319.12431

Davenport, T., & Kalakota, R. (2019). The potential for artificial intelligence in healthcare. Future Healthcare Journal, 6(2), 94–98. https://doi.org/10.7861/futurehosp.6-2-94

Davidson, A., & Wood, C. (2021). Women in business. Trinity U.

De Juan Pardo, Ma.Á., Russo, M.T., & Roqué Sanchez, M.V. (2018). A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration of living in old age. Geriatric Nursing, 39(1), 9–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gerinurse.2017.04.010

Duan, Y., Edwards, J.S., & Dwivedi, Y.K. (2019). Artificial intelligence for decision-making in the era of big data - evolution, challenges, and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 63–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2019.01.021

Dziak, M. (2020). Phenomenological psychology. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Eckstein, S. (2017). More seniors to repurpose; caregivers should prepare. Journal of Business (10756124), 32(16), 17.

Errasti-Ibarrondo, B., Jordan, J., Diez-Del-Corral, M., & Aranzamendi, M. (2018). Conducting phenomenological research: Rationalizing the methods and rigor of the phenomenology of practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 4V, 74(7), 1723–1724. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13569

Flair, I. (2021). Women in technology in the United States. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Fox, J. (2022). Evolution of decision-making (1/3): The rational revolution. The Decision Lab. Retrieved from https://thedecisionlab.com/insights/society/evolution-behavioral-economics-rational-revolution-part-1

Gaggioli, A. (2017). Bringing more transparency to artificial intelligence. CyberPsychology, Behavior & Social Networking, 20(1), 68. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2016.29060.csi

Garvey, C.M., & Jones, R. (2021). Is there a place for theoretical frameworks in qualitative research? International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609s406920987959

Gessl, A.S., Mevenkamp, N., & Schlögl, S. (2019). On the perceptions and acceptance of artificially intelligent robotics and the psychology of the future elderly. Behaviour & Information Technology, 38(11), 1068–1087. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2019.1566499

Ghimire, A., Thapa, S., Jha, A.K., Adhikari, S., & Kumar, A. (2020). Accelerating business growth with big data and artificial intelligence. 2020 Fourth International Conference on I-SMAC (IoT in Social, Mobile, Analytics, and Cloud), pp. 441–448. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAC49090.2020.9243318

Graham, S.A., Lee, E.E., Jeste, D.V., Van Patten, R., Twamley, E.W., Nebeker, C., . . . Depp, C.A. (2020). Artificial intelligence approaches to predicting and detecting cognitive decline in older adults: A conceptual review. Psychiatry Research, 284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2019.112732

Haan, M., Brankaert, R., Kenning, G., & Lu, Y. (2021). Creating a social learning environment for and by older adults in the use and adoption of smartphone technology to age in place. Public Health, 9, 568822. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.568822

Hafezi, R. (2020). How artificial intelligence can improve understanding in challenging chaotic environments. World Future, 12(2), 219–228. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/1946756719880539

Hastie, R., & Dawes, R.M. (2010). Rational choice in an uncertain world: The psychology of judgment and decision-making (2nd Ed.). Sage Publications.

Heidegger, M. (2013). The questions concerning technology and other essays. Harper Perennial Modern Thought.

Huang, M.H., Rust, R., & Maksimovic, V. (2019). The feeling economy: Managing in the next generation of artificial intelligence (AI). California Management Review, 61(4), 43–65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619863436

Huang, T.Y., & Huang, C.W. (2020). Older people’s acceptance of robot-assisted activities of daily living. Gerontechnology, 19(0), 1–1. https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2020.19.s.69863

Jefferson, R.S. (2019). More seniors are embracing technology. But can they use it? UCSD researchers suggest asking them. UC San Diego.

Jerath, R., & Beveridge, C. (2018). Top mysteries of the mind: Insights from the default space model of consciousness. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 12(162). https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2018.00162

Jokisch, M.R., Scheling, L., Doh, M., & Wahl, H.W. (2020). Internet adoption among older adults: What role does self-efficacy play in the technology acceptance model? International Society for Gerontechnology’s (ISG) 12th World Conference of Gerontechnology, October 6-9, 2020 (Virtual). Gerontechnology, 19(48). https://doi.org/10.4017/gt.2020.19.s.69880.3

Kadylak, T., & Cotton, S.R. (2020). United States older adults’ willingness to use emerging technologies. Information, Communication & Society, 23(5), 736–750. https://doi.org/10.1080/136911X.2020.1713848

Krell, D.F. (2008). Martin Heidegger Basic writings from being in time (1927) to the task of thinking (1964). Harper Perennial Modern Thought.

Larsen, H.G., & Adu, P. (2021). The theoretical framework in phenomenological research: Development and application. Routledge.

Leadership Charlotte. (2021). Rev. Dr. Major Stewart Leadership Charlotte (LC) Class: LC40. Encounter Charlotte. Retrieved from https://leadershipcharlotte.org/2021/11/29/major-stewart/

Leavy, P. (2017). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches. Guilford Publications.

Lenhoff, A. (2018). The clock is ticking: Toward biomarkers for aging? MLO: Medical Laboratory Observer, 50(2), 4.

Liu, C., Vlaev, I., Fang, C., Denrell, J., & Chater, N. (2017). Strategizing with biases: Making better decisions using the Mindspace approach. California Management Review, 59(3), 135–161. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125617707973

Liu, R., Li, X., & Chu, J. (2021). More love, more behavioral intention: Understanding elderly’s acceptance of smartphone applications. 2021 14th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), pp. 181–185. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISCID52796.2021.00050

Manh Do, H., Sheng, W., Harrington, E.E., & Bishop, A.J. (2021). Clinical screening interview using a social robot for geriatric care. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering, 18(3), 1229–1242. https://doi.org/10.1109/TASE.2020.2999203

Marimuthu, R., Gupta, S., Stapleton, L., Duncan, D., & Pasik-Duncan, B. (2022). Challenging the digital divide: Factors affecting the availability, adoption, and acceptance of future technology in elderly user communities. Computer, 55(7), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2022.3172026

Marston, H.R., & van Hoof, J. (2019). “Who doesn’t think about technology when designing urban environments for older people?” A case study approach to a proposed extension of the WHO’s age-friendly cities model. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(19). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16193525

Maxwell, J.A. (2013). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.

McGowan, L.J., Powell, R., & French, D.P. (2020). How can use of the theoretical domains framework be optimized in qualitative research? A rapid systematic review. British Journal of Health Psychology, 25(3), 677–694. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjhp.12437

Meltzoff, J. (1988). Critical thinking about research: Psychology and related fields. American Psychological Association.

Mercadal, T. (2021). Aging and the U.S. workforce. Salem Press Encyclopedia.

Moustakas, C. (1994). Transcendental phenomenology: Conceptual framework. In Phenomenological Research Methods (pp. 25–42). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412995658

Pak, R., & Mclaughlin, A. (2018). Aging, technology, and health. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2015-0-06164-0

Park, S.C. (2018). The Fourth Industrial Revolution and implications for innovative cluster policies. AI & Society, 33, 433–445. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-07775-5

Patton, M.Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice (4th Ed.). Sage Publications.

Peoples, K. (2020). How to write a phenomenological dissertation: A step-by-step guide. In Qualitative Research Methods. Sage Publications.

Petrovcic, A., Boot, W.R., Burnik, T., & Dolnicar, V. (2019). Improving the measurement of older adults’ mobile device proficiency: Results and implications from a study of older adult smartphone users. IEEE Access, 7, 150412–150422. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2947765

Pew Research Center. (2017). Tech adoption climbs among older adults.

Pickard, S. (2018). Health, illness, and frailty in old age: A phenomenological exploration. Journal of Aging Studies, 47, 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2018.10.002

Prada, G.-I., Nacu, R.M., Kozma, A., & Herghelegiu, A.M. (2018). Gerontechnology: Technology for older people. Buletin Stiintific, pp. 117–122.

Pugliese, A. (2019). The impact of AI. California CPA, 88(2), 4.

Ravitch, S.M., & Carl, N.M. (2016). Qualitative research: Bridging the conceptual, theoretical, and methodological. Sage Publications.

Redding, M. (2023). Technology for seniors. Retrieved from http://seniorliving.org/tech/

Rubin, H.J., & Rubin, I.S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.

Schwartz, R., Dodge, J., Smith, N.A., & Etzioni, O. (2019). Green AI. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1907.10597

Sejnowski, T.J. (2018). The deep learning revolution. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Library of Congress. Retrieved from http://lccn.loc.gov/2017044863

Shkedi, A. (2019). Data analysis in qualitative research: Practical and theoretical methodologies with optional use of a software tool.

Shrestha, Y.R., Ben-Menahem, S.M., & von Krogh, G. (2019). Organizational decision-making structures in the age of artificial intelligence. California Management Review, 61(4), 66–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/0008125619862257

Smith, W.K. (2014). Dynamic decision-making: A model of senior leaders managing strategic paradoxes. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1592–1623. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0932

Suddick, K.M., Cross, V., Vuoskoski, P., Galvin, K.T., & Stew, G. (2020). The work of hermeneutic phenomenology. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–14. SAGE Publications.

Talwar, R., & Koury, A. (2017). Artificial intelligence – The next frontier in IT security? Network Security, 4, 14–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1353-4858(17)30039-9

Tsai, H.-Y.S., Rikard, R.V., Cotten, S.R., & Shillair, R. (2019). Senior technology exploration, learning, and acceptance (STELA) model: A longitudinal randomized controlled trial from exploration to use. Educational Gerontology, 45(12), 728–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601277.2019.1690802

United States Census Bureau. (2021). Older population and aging. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/topics/population/older-aging.html

United States Department of Labor. (2021). Older workers. Retrieved from https://www.dol.gov/agencies/odep/program-areas/individuals/older-workers

Vagle, M.D. (2018). Crafting phenomenological research (2nd Ed.). Taylor & Francis.

van Manen, M. (2017a). But is it phenomenology? Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 775–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699570

van Manen, M. (2017b). Phenomenology in its original sense. Qualitative Health Research, 27(6), 810–825. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732317699381

Venturini, F. (2022). Intelligent technologies and productivity spillovers: Evidence from the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 194, 220–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2021.12.018

Vogels, E.A. (2019). Millennials stand out for their technology use, but older generations also embrace digital life. Retrieved from https://pewrsr.ch/2A3kD6X

Wang, K.H., Chen, G., & Chen, H.-G. (2018). Understanding technology adoption behavior by older adults. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 46(5), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.2224/sbp.6483

Wang, S., Bolling, K., Mao, W., Reichstadt, J., Jeste, D., Kim, H.-C., & Nebeker, C. (2019). Technology to support aging in place: Older adults’ perspectives. Healthcare, 7(2), 60. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare7020060

Weick, R. (2015). Enriching older adult lives through technology. Grand Rapids Business Journal, 33(26), 17.

Wright, L. (2013). Quality improvement and organizational change initiatives: Analysis of the U.S. Army’s warrior transition unit (WTU). Academy of Strategic Management Journal, 12(2), 95–111.

Yang, K.-C., & Shih, P.-H. (2020). Cognitive age in technology acceptance: At what age are people ready to adopt and continuously use fashionable products? Telematics and Informatics, 51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2020.101400

Yao, J.J. (2020). Elderly seniors vs. youthful seniors: Attributions and reshaping of aging expectations. The Qualitative Report, 25(8), 3047–3066. https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol25/iss8/13

Zhou, H. (2020). On the development of continuing education technology in an aging society. 2020 8th International Conference on Orange Technology (ICOT), pp. 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICOT51877.2020.9468732

Downloads

Published

2024-09-20

How to Cite

Gilliam, L., Lao, T., & Nweke, C. (2024). Examining Successful Management Practices Among Senior Women Using Artificial Intelligence Technology. Journal of Strategic Innovation and Sustainability, 19(3). https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i3.7252

Issue

Section

Articles