Unraveling the Dynamics of e-Government Digitization, Penetration and User Experience: A Case Study of Greek Municipalities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/jsis.v19i3.7376Keywords:
innovation, sustainability, e-democracy, e-municipalities, usability, user experience (UX), system performanceAbstract
This study examines the user experience (UX) of Greek municipal websites, the first in-depth look at local e-Government services in Greece. Using Lighthouse for technical performance and an Adapted UX Audit, it explores factors beyond digital skills affecting citizen adoption of these platforms. Findings reveal widespread deficiencies, with no municipality scoring above 55%, highlighting significant challenges in usability, functionality, and user satisfaction. Critical issues in Technical Performance and Missing Features, both scoring below 50%, suggest that inherent design flaws hinder user acceptance. The study emphasizes the need for improvements in feedback mechanisms, multilingual support, and accessible help sections to better serve diverse populations. Addressing these gaps could enhance e-democracy by fostering more inclusive, user-friendly services. The results advocate for a strategic overhaul of municipal websites to increase engagement, improve e-Government effectiveness, and strengthen democratic participation. Limitations and recommendations for future research and policy-making are also provided.
References
Adiyarta, K., Napitupulu, D., Nurdianto, H., Rahim, R., & Ahmar, A. (2018, May). User acceptance of E-Government Services Based on TRAM model. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 352, p.012057). IOP Publishing.
Ahmi, A., & MXohamad, R. (2016). Evaluating accessibility of Malaysian ministries websites using WCAG 2.0 and section 508 guideline. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 8(8).
Akgül, Y., & Vatansever, K. (2016). Web accessibility evaluation of government websites for people with disabilities in Turkey. Journal of Advanced Management Science, 4(3).
Almourad, M.B., Hussein, M., Kamoun, F., & Wattar, Z. (2019). Analysis of WCAG 2.0 data accessibility success criterion of e-government websites. Periodicals of Engineering and Natural Sciences, 7(1), 496–503.
Al Mourad, M., & Kamoun, F. (2013). Accessibility evaluation of Dubai e-government websites: Findings and implications. Journal of E-Government Studies and Best Practices.
Albert, B., & Tullis, T. (2013). Measuring the user experience: Collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. Newnes.
Alexander, D.A. (2020). UX Fundamentals for Non-UX Professionals: User Experience Principles for Managers, Writers, Designers, and Developers: Edward Stull [Book Review]. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 63(2), 203–204.
Alexopoulos, C., Charalabidis, Y., Vogiatzis, N., & Kolokotronis, D.E. (2018, April). A taxonomy for analysing smart cities developments in Greece. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 537–549).
Al-Faries, A., Al-Khalifa, H.S., Al-Razgan, M.S., & Al-Duwais, M. (2013, October). Evaluating the accessibility and usability of top Saudi e-government services. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (pp. 60–63).
Al-Omari, A., El-Gayar, O., & Deokar, A. (2012, January). Security policy compliance: User acceptance perspective. In 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 3317–3326). IEEE.
Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2017). Analysing the critical factors influencing trust in e-government adoption from citizens’ perspective: A systematic review and a conceptual framework. International Business Review, 26(1), 164–175.
Andersen, S.C., & Nielsen, H.S. (2020). Learning from performance information. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 30(3), 415–431.
Aslanov, H., & Mirzagayeva, S. (2022). The digitalization process: What has it led to, and what can we expect in the future?
Bansah, A.K., & Darko Agyei, D. (2022). Perceived convenience, usefulness, effectiveness and user acceptance of information technology: Evaluating students’ experiences of a Learning Management System. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 31(4), 431–449.
Barnes, S.J., & Vidgen, R.T. (2006). Data triangulation and web quality metrics: A case study in e-government. Information & Management, 43(6), 767–777.
Belanche, D., Casaló, L.V., Flavián, C., & Schepers, J. (2014). Trust transfer in the continued usage of public e-services. Information & Management, 51(6), 627–640.
Bevan, N. (2008). Measuring the user experience: collecting, analyzing, and presenting usability metrics. In CHI 2008 Workshop on user experience evaluation methods in product development. Florence.
Brajnik, G., Yesilada, Y., & Harper, S. (2010, October). Testability and validity of WCAG 2.0: The expertise effect. In Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility (pp. 43–50).
Bureau of Internet Accessibility (2021). Google’s Lighthouse accessibility tests are helpful, but not perfect. Retrieved September 20, 2022, from https://www.boia.org/blog/googles-lighthouse-accessibility-tests-are-helpful-but-not-perfect
Chatzoglou, P., Chatzoudes, D., Vraimaki, E., & Diamantidis, A. (2013). Service quality in the public sector: the case of the Citizen’s Service Centers (CSCs) of Greece. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 62(6), 583–605.
Chau, P.Y., & Lai, V.S. (2003). An empirical investigation of the determinants of user acceptance of internet banking. Journal of Organizational Computing and Electronic Commerce, 13(2), 123–145.
Corrigan, M., & Miller, H.G. (2011). Toward a user-centric digital ecosystem. IT Professional, 13(4), 12–15.
Costopoulou, C., Ntalianis, F., Ntaliani, M., Karetsos, S., & Gkoutzioupa, E. (2017). e-Participation provision and demand analysis for greek municipalities. In E-Democracy–Privacy-Preserving, Secure, Intelligent E-Government Services: 7th International Conference, E-Democracy 2017, Athens, Greece, December 14-15, 2017, Proceedings 7 (pp. 3–14). Springer International Publishing.
Costopoulou, C., Ntaliani, M., & Ntalianis, F. (2021). Evolution of e-participation in Greek local government. Information Polity, 26(3), 311–325.
Delopoulos, H.N. (2015). A usability evaluation of e-government services: The case of e-deliberation service of Greece. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 7(2), 93–112.
Drivas, I.C., Sakas, D.P. & Reklitis, P., (2019). Improving Website Usability and Traffic Based on Users Perceptions and Suggestions––A User-Centered Digital Marketing Approach. In D. Sakas, & D. Nasiopoulos (Eds.), Strategic Innovative Marketing. IC-SIM 2017 (pp. 255–266). Cham: Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer.
Egri, G., & Bayrak, C. (2014). The role of search engine optimization on keeping the user on the site. Procedia Computer Science, 36, 335–342.
Elshan, E., Zierau, N., Engel, C., Janson, A., & Leimeister, J.M. (2022). Understanding the design elements affecting user acceptance of intelligent agents: Past, present and future. Information Systems Frontiers, 24(3), 699–730.
European Commission (2020). eGovernment Benchmark 2020: eGovernment that works for the people. Brussels.
European Commission (2010). A digital agenda for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
Fernandes, F.R., Paschoarelli, L.C., & Da Silva, J.C.P. (2013). Evaluating interaction with websites: case study of a government website of the Brazilian ministry of labor and employment. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Web, Mobile, and Product Design: Second International Conference, DUXU 2013, Held as Part of HCI International 2013, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 21-26, 2013, Proceedings, Part IV 2 (pp. 265–273). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Hanlon, A. (2022). Digital Marketing (2nd ed.). California: SAGE Publications.
Hartson, R., & Pyla, P.S. (2012). The UX Book: Process and guidelines for ensuring a quality user experience. Elsevier.
Hassenzahl, M., & Tractinsky, N. (2006). User experience-a research agenda. Behaviour & Information Technology, 25(2), 91–97.
Hassenzahl, M., & Ullrich, D. (2007). To do or not to do: Differences in user experience and retrospective judgments depending on the presence or absence of instrumental goals. Interacting With Computers, 19(4), 429–437.
Isa, W.A.R.W.M., Suhami, M.R., Safie, N.I., & Semsudin, S.S. (2011). Assessing the usability and accessibility of Malaysia e-government website. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 40–46.
Jati, H., & Dominic, D.D. (2009, April). Quality evaluation of e-government website using web diagnostic tools: Asian case. In 2009 International conference on information management and engineering (pp. 85–89). IEEE.
Kaisara, G., & Pather, S. (2011). The e-Government evaluation challenge: A South African Batho Pele-aligned service quality approach. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 211–221.
Karunasena, K., & Deng, H. (2012). Critical factors for evaluating the public value of e-government in Sri Lanka. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 76–84.
Kelly, S., Kaye, S.A., & Oviedo-Trespalacios, O. (2023). What factors contribute to the acceptance of artificial intelligence? A systematic review. Telematics and Informatics, 77, 101925.
Knijnenburg, B.P., Willemsen, M.C., Gantner, Z., Soncu, H., & Newell, C. (2012). Explaining the user experience of recommender systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 22, 441–504.
Kopackova, H., Michalek, K., & Cejna, K. (2010). Accessibility and findability of local e-government websites in the Czech Republic. Universal Access in the Information Society, 9, 51–61.
Kuzma, J.M. (2010). Accessibility design issues with UK e-government sites. Government Information Quarterly, 27(2), 141–146.
Lappas, G., Triantafillidou, A., Yannas, P., & Kleftodimos, A. (2015). Local e-government and e-democracy: An evaluation of Greek municipalities. In E-Democracy–Citizen Rights in the World of the New Computing Paradigms: 6th International Conference, E-Democracy 2015, Athens, Greece, December 10-11, 2015, Proceedings 6 (pp. 134–150). Springer International Publishing.
Latif, M.H.A., & Masrek, M.N. (2010). Accessibility evaluation on Malaysian e-government websites. Journal of E-Government Studies and Best Practices, 2010, 1–11.
Li, C.F., & Jiang, Y.Q. (2019). Research on the optimization method of website based on user experience. In Advances in Usability, User Experience and Assistive Technology: Proceedings of the AHFE 2018 International Conferences on Usability & User Experience and Human Factors and Assistive Technology, Held on July 21–25, 2018, in Loews Sapphire Falls Resort at Universal Studios, Orlando, Florida, USA 9 (pp. 412–421). Springer International Publishing.
Macintosh, A. (2004, January). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. In 37th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2004. Proceedings of the (p.10). IEEE.
Ministry of Administrative Reconstruction (2014). e-Government in Greece. Hellenic Republic, Athens.
Nakatumba-Nabende, J., Kanagwa, B., Kivunike, F.N., & Tuape, M. (2019). Evaluation of accessibility standards on Ugandan e-government websites. Electronic Government, An International Journal, 15(4), 355–371.
Nielsen, J. (1995). How to conduct a heuristic evaluation. Nielsen Norman Group, 1(1), 8.
Papadopoulou, P., Nikolaidou, M., & Martakos, D. (2010, January). What is trust in e-government? A proposed typology. In 2010 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). IEEE.
Papadomichelaki, X., & Mentzas, G. (2012). e-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing e-government service quality. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 98–109.
Paul, S. (2023). Accessibility analysis using WCAG 2.1: Evidence from Indian e-government websites. Universal Access in the Information Society, 22(2), 663–669.
Petrovic, K., & Siegmann, M. (2011). Make space for the customer: The shift towards customer centricity. In Design, User Experience, and Usability. Theory, Methods, Tools and Practice: First International Conference, DUXU 2011, Held as Part of HCI International 2011, Orlando, FL, USA, July 9-14, 2011, Proceedings, Part I 1 (pp. 485–490). Springer Berlin Heidelberg.
Rasyid, A., & Alfina, I. (2017). E-service quality evaluation on e-government website: Case study BPJS Kesehatan Indonesia. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 801, No. 1, p.012036). IOP Publishing.
Riedmann-Streitz, C. (2018). Redefining the customer centricity approach in the digital age. In Design, User Experience, and Usability: Theory and Practice: 7th International Conference, DUXU 2018, Held as Part of HCI International 2018, Las Vegas, NV, USA, July 15-20, 2018, Proceedings, Part I 7 (pp. 203–222). Springer International Publishing.
Shareia, B.F. (2016). Qualitative and quantitative case study research method on social science: Accounting perspective. International Journal of Economics and Management Engineering, 10(12), 3849–3854.
Schilhan, L., Kaier, C., & Lackner, K. (2021). Increasing visibility and discoverability of scholarly publications with academic search engine optimization. Insights, 34(1).
Schumacher, J., Dobler, M., Dillon, E., Power, G., Fiedler, M., Erman, D., ... & Argente, J.R. (2010, September). Providing a user centric always best connection. In 2010 2nd International Conference on Evolving Internet (pp. 80–85). IEEE.
Schmutz, S., Sonderegger, A., & Sauer, J. (2017). Implementing recommendations from web accessibility guidelines: A comparative study of nondisabled users and users with visual impairments. Human Factors, 59(6), 956–972.
Sönmez, F., Aydin, U., & Perdahci, Z.N. (2024). Investigation of university websites from technology acceptance model and information architecture perspective: A case study. Journal of Information Science, 50(2), 466–480.
Taherdoost, H. (2018). Development of an adoption model to assess user acceptance of e-service technology: E-Service Technology Acceptance Model. Behaviour & Information Technology, 37(2), 173–197.
Tan, C.W., Benbasat, T.I. & Cenfetelli, R., 2008. Building citizen trust towards e-government services: Do high quality websites matter. In Best Practices Audits. Retrieved September 6, 2022, from https://web.dev/lighthouse-best-practices/
Travis, D. (2014). 247 web usability guidelines. Retrieved from https://www.userfocus.co.uk/resources/guidelines.html
United Nations: UN E-government Survey (2018). E-Government in support of sustainable development.
Van Riel, A.C., Liljander, V., & Jurriens, P. (2001). Exploring consumer evaluations of e‐services: A portal site. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 12(4), 359–377.
Vasilikopoulou, A. (2017). The usability of e-government (Citizen to Government) sites in Greece.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., & Xu, X. (2016). Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: A synthesis and the road ahead. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 17(5), 328–376.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J.Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Quarterly, pp. 157–178.
Vial, G. (2021). Understanding digital transformation: A review and a research agenda. Managing Digital Transformation, pp. 13–66.
Wang, H., Tao, D., Yu, N., & Qu, X. (2020). Understanding consumer acceptance of healthcare wearable devices: An integrated model of UTAUT and TTF. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 139, 104156.
Wimmer, M.A. (2007, December). Ontology for an e-participation virtual resource centre. In Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance (pp. 89–98).
Yahya, M., Nadzar, F., & Rahman, B.A. (2012). Examining user acceptance of e-syariah portal among syariah users in Malaysia. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 67, 349–359.
Yannas, P., & Lappas, G. (2007, October). Evaluating local e-government: An analysis of Greek prefecture websites. In 2007 2nd International Conference on Digital Information Management (Vol. 1, pp. 254–259). IEEE.
