A Boon or Bane? Challenges and Opportunities of AI Adoption in Higher Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.33423/7y7p5d66Keywords:
Higher Education, AI, academic integrity, student engagement, quasi-plagiarism, AI policyAbstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is reshaping higher education by transforming how students learn, how faculty teach, and how institutions manage academic processes. While AI offers opportunities for autonomy, competence, collaboration, and efficiency, it also raises concerns of dependency, quasi-plagiarism, and academic dishonesty. This conceptual paper synthesizes insights from ten institutional cases across global contexts and draws on five theoretical foundations, Diffusion of Innovation, the Technology Acceptance Model, Self-Determination Theory, Social Learning Theory, and Academic Integrity frameworks, to propose a process model of AI adoption and use in higher education. The model explains how faculty engagement, institutional policy, student motivation, peer norms, and integrity enforcement interact to shape learning outcomes, distinguishing authentic use of AI from misuse. By addressing policy gaps, governance challenges, and equity concerns, the study contributes to theory by advancing multi-framework integration and to practice by offering strategies for ethical, responsible, and sustainable AI adoption in higher education.
References
An, Y., Yu, J.H., & James, S. (2025). Investigating the higher education institutions’ guidelines and policies regarding the use of generative AI in teaching, learning, research, and administration. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(10). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00507-3
Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Prentice Hall. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117700200317
Bretag, T. (2019). Academic integrity. In P. Teixeira & J. Shin (Eds.), Encyclopedia of international higher education systems and institutions (pp. 1–6). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9553-1_221-1
Bretag, T., Harper, R., Burton, M., Ellis, C., Newton, P., Rozenberg, P., Saddiqui, S., & van Haeringen, K. (2019). Contract cheating: A survey of Australian university staff. Studies in Higher Education, 44(11), 1837–1856. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1462789
Chan, C.K.Y. (2023). A comprehensive AI policy education framework for university teaching and learning. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(38). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00408-3
Christensen, C.M., & Eyring, H.J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. American Council on Education. Retrieved from https://www.csuchico.edu/futurepossibilities/_assets/documents/the-innovative-university-report-ace.pdf
Cotton, D.R.E., Cotton, P.A., & Shipway, J.R. (2023). ChatGPT, AI and the future of assessment: Implications for higher education. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 60(5), 612–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2190148
Daniel, J. (2012). Making sense of MOOCs: Musings in a maze of myth, paradox and possibility. Journal of Interactive Media in Education, 2012(3), Article 18. https://doi.org/10.5334/2012-18
Davis, F.D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Dawson, P., Tai, J., & Mahoney, P. (2023). Academic integrity in the age of artificial intelligence. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(7), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2201105
Deci, E.L., & Ryan, R.M. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
Dotan, R., Parker, L.S., & Radzilowicz, J.G. (2024). Responsible adoption of generative AI in higher education: A “points to consider” approach. In Proceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT ’24) (pp. 1–11). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/3630106.3659023
Glover, J. (2024). Building an AI university: The University of Florida case study. Educause Review, 59(2), 45–58. Retrieved from https://ai.ufl.edu/media/aiufledu/resources/Building-an-AI-university-An-administrators-guide.pdf
Hartley, J.F. (1994). Case studies in organizational research. In C. Cassell & G. Symon (Eds.), Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical guide (pp. 208–229). Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://oro.open.ac.uk/36979/
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2021). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.14025.57440
Jin, Y., Yan, L., Echeverria, V., Gašević, D., & Martinez-Maldonado, R. (2024). Generative AI in higher education: A global perspective of institutional adoption policies and guidelines. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 8, 100348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100348
Kasneci, E., Sessler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., et al. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
Lund, B.D., Wang, T., Mannuru, N.R., Nie, B., Shimray, S., & Wang, Z. (2023). ChatGPT and other large language models: Applications and challenges for education. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 100234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2023.100234
Luo, J. (2024). A critical review of GenAI policies in higher education assessment: A call to reconsider the “originality” of students’ work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2024.2309963
Moorhouse, B.L., Yeo, M.A., & Wan, Y. (2023). Generative AI tools and assessment: Guidelines of the world’s top-ranking universities. Computers & Education Open, 5, 100151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2023.100151
O’Dea, X. (2024). Generative AI: Is it a paradigm shift for higher education? Studies in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2024.2332944
Rogers, E.M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203710753
Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2020). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1521/978.14625/28806
Selwyn, N. (2023). Education and AI: Policy, pedagogy and practice. Learning, Media and Technology, 48(2), 111–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2023.2188951
Southworth, J., et al. (2023). Developing a model for AI across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
Tlili, A., Huang, R., Chang, T.W., Nascimbeni, F., & Burgos, D. (2023). Generative AI for education: Opportunities, threats, and policy implications. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(5), 2203–2224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10272-2
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F.D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Xia, Q., et al. (2024). A scoping review on how generative artificial intelligence affects higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00468-z
Yin, R.K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage. Retrieved from https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/case-study-research-and-applications/book250150
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V.I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2019). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0171-0
