Professional Development: Attendees' Perceptions from Previous PD Opportunities/Preferences for Follow-up Activities

Authors

  • Jeff Knox St. Ambrose University
  • David Krupke St. Ambrose University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33423/fg0qkm13

Keywords:

higher education, attendees' perceptions, attendees' preferences, curriculum & content, follow-up, professional development

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the perceptions attendees have of Professional Development meetings. In addition, attendees were asked to state their preferences for PD follow-up. Data were analyzed in terms of attendee assignment, and career stage (based on Huberman, 1989).

Results indicated that both assignment and career stage were not significantly related to perception. Follow-up preferences were varied, indicating individual needs.

This information is important for PD providers, who must be kept accountable to attendees for relevant information.

References

Anderson, L., & Olson B. (2006). Investigating early career urban teachers’ perspectives on and experience in professional development. Teacher and Teacher Education, 57, 359–377.

Beijaard, D. (2006). Teachers’ prior experiences and actual perceptions of professional identity. Teachers and Teaching, 1, 281–294.

Blanford, S. (2001). Professional development in schools: Early professional development for teachers. In F. Banks & S. Mayes (Eds.). England: David Fulton Publishers, Ltd.

Brown, C.P., & Englehardt, J. (2016). Conceptions of and early childhood educators’ experiences in early childhood professional development programs: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 37, 216–244.

Charbaji, S. (2017). Determinants of perception of professional development. Journal of Business and Economic Management, 5, 68–73.

Dall’Alba, G. (2009). Learning professional ways of being: Ambiguities of becoming. Education Research and Theory, 41, 34–45.

Diaz-Maggoli, G. (2004). Teacher-centered professional development. ABD Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Routledge.

Garet, M.S., Porter, A.C., Desimone, L., Birman, B.F., & Yoon, K.S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.

Guskey, T.R., & Yoon, K.S. (2009). What works in professional development? Phi Delta Kappan, March 2009.

Guskey, T.R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4).

Hirsh, S. (2001). Training without follow-up is malpractice. National Staff Development Council, Dallas, TX.

Hirsh, S. (2006). NSDC standards provide a richer definition of professional development than does NCLB. NSDC, 27, Summer 2006.

Huberman, M. (1989). The professional life cycle of teachers. Teachers College Record, 91, 31–57.

Ingvarson, L., Meiers, M., & Beavis, A. (2005). Factors affecting the impact of professional development programs on teachers’ knowledge, practice, student outcomes, and efficacy. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/professional_dev/1

Joyce, B., & Showers, B. (1995). Student achievement through staff development: Fundamentals of school renewal (2nd ed.). White Plains, NY: Longman.

Kelly, D., Harper, D.J., & Landau, B. (2008). Questionnaire mode effects in interactive information retrieval experiments. Information Processing and Management, 44, 122–141.

Learning Forward. (2011). Standards for professional learning. Dallas, TX: Learning Forward.

Nielsen, J., & Levy, J. (1994). Measuring instability: Preferences and performance. CAC Archive, 37, 66–75.

Richter, D., Kunter, M., Klusmann, U., Ludtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2011). Professional development across the teaching career: Teachers’ uptake of formal and informal learning opportunities. Teacher and Teacher Education, 27, 116–126.

Schomaker, M. (2004). Tipping point: From feckless reform to substantive instructional improvement. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 424–432.

Sparks, D. (2002). Designing powerful professional development for teachers and principals. Oxford, Ohio: National Staff Development Council.

Sulliva, G.M., & Ardino, A.R., Jr. (2013). Analyzing and interpreting data from Likert-type scales. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 5, 541–542.

Warren-Little, J. (2012). Professional community and professional development in the learning-centered school. In M. Kooy & K. van Veen (Eds.), Teacher learning that matters (pp. 22–43). ABD: Routledge.

Yurtseven, N. (2017). The investigation of teachers’ metaphoric perceptions about professional development. Journal of Education and Learning, 6, 120–137.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Knox, J., & Krupke, D. (2026). Professional Development: Attendees’ Perceptions from Previous PD Opportunities/Preferences for Follow-up Activities. Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice, 26(4). https://doi.org/10.33423/fg0qkm13