A Hammer in Search of a Nail: A Tale of Experiential Learning

Abstract

In this paper, we present a composite case study that explores trade-offs and tensions in the development and administration of Experiential Learning (EL) programs at broad-access universities. There are four main categories of trade-offs that must be acknowledged and negotiated: (1) quality vs. cost, (2) institutional versus individual goals, (3) institutional aims for the student experience versus students aims from participating in an EL program, and (4) providing “real-life” experiences vs. protecting vulnerable students from “real-world” inequalities. Unfortunately, the nature of trade-off is such that no matter what decisions are made, certain goals will likely be unmet, and some stakeholders will be unsatisfied. The downside of an Experiential Learning program—like any ambitious, under-resourced undertaking— is that time and effort may be wasted, and little achieved; the upside, however, is that implementing an EL program can force an institution to define its priorities.